ArticleScientific reports2025
Intelligent deep federated learning model for enhancing security in internet of things enabled edge computing environment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- GLANet: global and local anomaly network for distributed cyber threat detection using FL.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Energy-Efficient Cryptographic Protocols for Sustainable IoT Security: A Federated Learning-Enhanced Lightweight Framework with Post-Quantum Resilience.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- AnomLocal: A hybrid local-global anomaly detection model for network security using federated learning.PloS one · 2026Article
- BlueEdge neural network approach and its application to automated data type classification in mobile edge computing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A comprehensive survey on securing the social internet of things: protocols, threat mitigation, technological integrations, tools, and performance metrics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Lightweight ECC-Based Self-Healing Federated Learning Framework for Secure IIoT Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
In the present scenario, the Internet of Things (IoT) and edge computing technologies have been developing rapidly, foremost to the development of new tasks in security and privacy. Personal information and privacy leakage have become the main concerns in IoT edge computing surroundings. The promptly developing IoT-connected devices below an integrated Machine Learning (ML) method might threaten data confidentiality. The standard centralized ML-assisted methods have been challenging because they require vast numbers of data in a vital unit. Due to the rising distribution of information in many systems of linked devices, decentralized ML solutions have been required. Federated learning (FL) was proposed as an optimal solution to discover these privacy issues. Still, the heterogeneity of systems in IoT edge computing environments poses an essential task when executing FL. Therefore, this paper develops an Intelligent Deep Federated Learning Model for Enhancing Security (IDFLM-ES) approach in the IoT-enabled edge-computing environment. The presented IDFLM-ES approach aims to identify unwanted intrusions to certify the safety of the IoT environment. To accomplish this, the IDFLM-ES technique introduces a federated hybrid deep belief network (FHDBN) model using FL on time series data produced by the IoT edge devices. Besides, the IDFLM-ES technique uses data normalization and golden jackal optimization (GJO) based feature selection as a pre-processing step. Besides, the IDFLM-ES technique learns the individual and distributed feature representation over distributed databases to enhance model convergence for quick learning. Finally, the dung beetle optimizer (DBO) model is utilized to choose the effectual hyperparameter of the FHDBN model. The simulation value of the IDFLM-ES methodology is verified using a benchmark database. The experimental validation of the IDFLM-ES methodology portrayed a superior accuracy value of 98.24% compared to other models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.