Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39900647›Full record

ArticleBDJ open2025

Regenerative potential of concentrated growth factor compared to platelet-rich fibrin in treatment of necrotic mature teeth: a randomized clinical trial.

Taghreed Salah, Wael Hussein, Heba Abdelkafy

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BDJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06227533 (Comparison Between Two Regenerative Scaffolds Outcome in The Treatment of Mature Teeth With Necrotic Pulp and Periapical Radiolucency), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06227533 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison Between Two Regenerative Scaffolds Outcome in The Treatment of Mature Teeth With Necrotic Pulp and Periapical Radiolucency

TypeinterventionalSponsorFaculty of Dental Medicine for GirlsRan2021 to 2023Enrolled18ConditionsPulp NecrosesArmsEndodontic regeneration using concentrated growth factor compared with Platelet rich fibrin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Taghreed SalahDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. TaghreedAbdelrazek.26@azhar.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3411-7492
Wael HusseinDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Heba AbdelkafyDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8612-2732

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study aimed to compare the potential of two regenerative endodontic procedures, platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and concentrated growth factor (CGF), in the treatment of mature permanent teeth with necrotic pulps and periapical radiolucency.

methodsThis randomized clinical trial was written according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Randomized Trials in Endodontics 2020 guidelines. The study was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry ( ClinicalTrials.gov ) with identifier number NCT06227533. Eighteen patients with mature necrotic maxillary incisors with periapical lesions were randomly divided into two groups, one group received treatment with PRF (n = 9), while the other received CGF (n = 9). Radiographs were taken at the beginning, 6 and 12 months after treatment, and confirmed with CBCT to assess periradicular healing. An electric pulp tester and cold test were used to determine whether pulp sensibility had been regained during the follow-up period. The statistical analysis used an independent t-test to compare different groups. Repeated measures ANOVA to compare pre-operative, after 6 months, and after 1 year in the same group.

resultsBoth groups experienced a considerable increase in healing at 6 and 12 months compared to baseline, with no significant differences seen regarding lesion size (p-value was 0.34) and relative bone density (p-value was 0.27). There was no substantial change in the tooth sensibility reading between both groups at 6 months (p-value = 0.34), After 1 year, both groups exhibited identical patterns.

conclusionRevascularization using PRF or CGF successfully preserved mature teeth with necrotic pulps.

Identifiers

PMID39900647
PMCPMC11790909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.