Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39900579›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Sensorimotor environment but not task rule reconfigures population dynamics in rhesus monkey posterior parietal cortex.

Hao Guo, Shenbing Kuang, Alexander Gail

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hao GuoGerman Primate Center, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2515-8475
Shenbing KuangState Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2113-8258
Alexander GailGerman Primate Center, Göttingen, Germany. agail@dpz.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1165-4646

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primates excel at mapping sensory inputs flexibly onto motor outcomes. We asked if the neural dynamics to support context-sensitive sensorimotor mapping generalizes or differs between different behavioral contexts that demand such flexibility. We compared reaching under mirror-reversed vision, a case of adaptation to a modified sensorimotor environment (SE), with anti reaching, a case of applying an abstract task rule (TR). While neural dynamics in monkey posterior parietal cortex show shifted initial states and non-aligned low-dimensional neural subspaces in the SE task, remapping is achieved in overlapping subspaces in the TR task. A recurrent neural network model demonstrates how output constraints mimicking SE and TR tasks are sufficient to generate the two fundamentally different neural computational dynamics. We conclude that sensorimotor remapping to implement an abstract task rule happens within the existing repertoire of neural dynamics, while compensation of perturbed sensory feedback requires exploration of independent neural dynamics in parietal cortex.

Indexed as

Feedback, SensoryParietal LobeAnimalsMacaca mulattaMaleModels, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsPsychomotor Performance

Identifiers

PMID39900579
PMCPMC11791165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.