Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39900423›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Pathway Of Low Anterior Resection syndrome (LARS) relief after Surgery (POLARiS): protocol for an international, open-label, multi-arm, phase 3 randomised superiority trial within a cohort, with economic evaluation, process evaluation and qualitative sub-study, to explore the natural history of LARS and compare transanal irrigation and sacral neuromodulation to optimised conservative management for people with major LARS following a high or low anterior resection for colorectal cancer.

Julie Croft, Emily Farrow, Alexandra Harriet Coxon-Meggy, Katie Gordon, Neil Corrigan, Hannah Mather, Deborah D Stocken, Megan Dale, Huey Yi Chong, Judith White and 15 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Living with low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer surgery: challenges, self-management, and supportive care priorities.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. 'Everyone has their own way-there's no protocol'. An Australian qualitative study of clinician perspectives on the management of low anterior resection syndrome.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Julie CroftClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7586-3394
Emily FarrowSchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7498-1161
Alexandra Harriet Coxon-MeggyColorectal Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5637-8457
Katie GordonClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1483-0657
Neil CorriganClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1424-9830
Hannah MatherClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Deborah D StockenClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Megan DaleCardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7229-5109
Huey Yi ChongCardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Judith WhiteCEDAR, University Hospital of Wales Healthcare NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK.
Laura KnightCEDAR, University Hospital of Wales Healthcare NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK.
Alun MeggyResearch and Development, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Christina LloydwinCwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board, Abercynon, UK.
Betty TanNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney CAR, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia.
Ashley DouglasNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney CAR, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia.
Ralph PowellInvolving People Wales, Health and Care Research Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Julie HepburnInvolving People Wales, Health and Care Research Wales, Cardiff, UK.
David JayneDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Jared TorkingtonColorectal Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3218-0574
Andrea WarwickDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, QEII Jubilee Hospital, Acacia Ridge, Queensland, Australia.
Kheng-Seong NgDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Kate WilsonCentral Clinical School, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Charles H KnowlesCentre for Academic Surgery, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry Blizard Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9854-6754
Aaron QuynConsultant Colorectal Surgeon, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Leeds, UK.
Julie CornishCardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK julie.cornish@wales.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4360-4472

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAs a result of improving survival rates, the adverse consequences of rectal cancer surgery are becoming increasingly recognised. Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is one such consequence and describes a constellation of bowel symptoms after rectal cancer surgery which includes urgency, faecal incontinence, stool clustering and incomplete evacuation. LARS has a significant adverse impact on quality of life (QoL) and symptoms are present in up to 75% of patients in the first year after surgery. Despite this, little is known about the natural history and there is poor evidence to support current treatment options. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The objectives of POLARiS are to explore the natural history of LARS and to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of transanal irrigation (TAI) or sacral neuromodulation (SNM) compared with optimised conservative management (OCM) for people with major LARS.POLARiS is a prospective, international, open-label, multi-arm, phase 3 randomised superiority trial within a cohort design, with internal pilot phase, qualitative sub-study, process evaluation and economic evaluation. Approximately 1500 adult participants from UK hospitals and 500 from Australian hospitals who have undergone a high or low anterior resection for colorectal cancer in the last 10 years will be recruited into the cohort. Six-hundred participants from the UK and 200 participants from Australia, with major LARS symptoms, defined as a LARS score of ≥30, will be recruited to the randomised controlled trial (RCT) element. Participants entering the RCT will be randomised between OCM, TAI or SNM, all with equal allocation ratios.Cohort and RCT participants will be followed up for a 24-month period, completing a series of questionnaires measuring LARS symptoms and QoL, as well as clinical review for those in the RCT. A process evaluation, qualitative sub-study and economic evaluation will also be conducted.The primary outcome measure of the POLARiS cohort and RCT is the LARS score up to 24 months post-registration/randomisation. Analyses of the RCT will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. Comparative effectiveness analyses for each endpoint will consist of two pairwise treatment comparisons: TAI versus OCM and SNM versus OCM. Secondary outcomes include health-related QoL, adverse events, treatment compliance and cost-effectiveness (up to 24 months post-registration/randomisation). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted by Wales REC 4 (reference: 23/WA/0171) in the UK and Sydney Local Health District HREC (reference: 2023/ETH00749) in Australia. The results of this trial will be disseminated to participants on request and published on completion of the trial in a peer-reviewed journal and at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN12834598; ACTRN12623001166662.

Indexed as

Conservative TreatmentElectric Stimulation TherapyFecal IncontinencePostoperative ComplicationsProctectomyRectal NeoplasmsTherapeutic IrrigationClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCost-Benefit AnalysisEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansLow Anterior Resection SyndromeProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSyndromeClinical TrialColorectal surgeryQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID39900423
PMCPMC11800293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.