ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2025
A Retrospective Study Using a Novel Body-Shift Implant Design with a Novel Alloplastic Particulate Grafting Material in Immediate Extraction Sockets.
Article in European journal of dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With resurgence in immediate tooth replacement therapy (ITRT) as a method of preserving both hard and soft tissues for improved aesthetic outcomes, this multicenter, prospective study looked at two novel products and their effect on those outcomes. Thirty-one maxillary single-tooth implants were included, of these 54.8% were central incisors, 25.8% lateral incisors, and 19.4% canines. Three complications were reported; one case nondraining fistula, one case a nonseated provisional restoration, and one case a fractured zirconia abutment. The definitive restorations were delivered between 4 hours and 18 months postimplant placement and all restorations were screw-retained. ITRT is frequently utilized when a tooth to be extracted will be replaced by an implant aiding in preservation of the hard and soft tissue that may be lost due to resorption during healing of the extraction socket. The narrower neck region of the Inverta implant results in thicker crestal bone around the implant, where loading under function occurs. Grafting that area around the implant at placement with EthOss results in more predictable bone stability in the long term.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.