Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39900013›Full record

ArticleOphthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde2025

The Spectrum of Functional, Structural, and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A MACUSTAR Study Report.

Jan Henrik Terheyden, Frank G Holz, Charlotte Behning, Hannah M P Dunbar, Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg, Adnan Tufail, Matthias Schmid, David P Crabb, Marlene Saßmannshausen, Alison Binns and 12 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Jan Henrik TerheydenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany, jan.terheyden@ukbonn.de.
Frank G HolzDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Charlotte BehningInformatics and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, Institute for Medical Biometry, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Hannah M P DunbarUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK.
Steffen Schmitz-ValckenbergDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Adnan TufailMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Matthias SchmidInformatics and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, Institute for Medical Biometry, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
David P CrabbDepartment of Optometry and Visual Science, City, University of London, London, UK.
Marlene SaßmannshausenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Alison BinnsDepartment of Optometry and Visual Science, City, University of London, London, UK.
Carel B HoyngRadboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nadia ZakariaNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Stephen PoorNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Klaus-Peter MollNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Deborah CosetteCarl Zeiss Meditec AG, Dublin, California, USA.
Cecília MartinhoAssociation for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image, Coimbra, Portugal.
Joana BatucaEuropean Clinical Research Infrastructure Network, Paris, France.
José Cunha-VazAssociation for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image, Coimbra, Portugal.
Ulrich F O LuhmannRoche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Translational Medicine Ophthalmology, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Sergio LealBayer Consumer Care AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Robert P FingerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
MACUSTAR consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is an unmet medical need for therapies in intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD). The prospective European multicenter cohort study MACUSTAR validates structural, functional, and patient-reported iAMD endpoints for use in future trials. The multiplicity of assessments allows characterizing iAMD in more dimensions than previously available. We describe the heterogeneity of assessments in the iAMD baseline cohort of the MACUSTAR study.

methodsA wide range of assessments was administered across 20 European study sites in accordance with established guidelines. These assessments encompassed multiple structural evaluations, such as color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, and optical coherence tomography. Additionally, functional tests were conducted, including assessments of best-corrected and low-luminance visual acuity (VA), Moorfields acuity, contrast sensitivity, reading speed, mesopic and scotopic microperimetry, and dark adaptometry. Moreover, patient-reported outcome assessments, specifically the Vision Impairment in Low Luminance questionnaire, were also incorporated into the evaluation process. Associations between variables were investigated using Phi coefficients, Pearson correlation coefficients and age-corrected regression models.

resultsFive-hundred eighty-five individuals with iAMD (66% women; mean (standard deviation) age: 72 ± 7 years) were included in the MACUSTAR study. Forty-nine percent had pigmentary abnormalities, 27% had reticular pseudodrusen; 10% and 9% had incomplete and complete retinal pigment epithelium and outer retinal atrophy at baseline, respectively. Mean best-corrected VA, low-luminance VA and mesopic average threshold on microperimetry at baseline were 0.03 ± 0.11 logMAR, 0.24 ± 0.16 logMAR, and 23.3 ± 3.7 dB. Mean Vision Impairment in Low Luminance (VILL) subscale scores at baseline were 2 ± 2 to 2 ± 3 logits. Phi coefficients between structural assessments ranged between 0.17 and 0.22 (median 0.21); correlation coefficients between function tests ranged between 0.07 and 0.69 (median 0.34) and between VILL scores ranged between 0.21 and 0.68 (median 0.23).

conclusionThe findings from this broad and comprehensive spectrum of assessments of structure, function, and patient-reported outcomes in iAMD suggest that the disease spectrum is diverse and heterogeneous and that further efforts are necessary to fully understand and characterize iAMD in all its complexities. A further in-depth characterization will enable novel enrichment strategies for clinical trials in iAMD.

Indexed as

Contrast SensitivityFluorescein AngiographyMacula LuteaMacular DegenerationPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityVisual FieldsAgedAged, 80 and overDark AdaptationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFundus OculiHumansMaleAge-related macular degenerationBaseline characteristicsClinical endpointImagingPatient-reported outcomeVisual function

Identifiers

PMID39900013
PMCPMC11999656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.