Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39899919›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2025

Real-world access to buprenorphine treatment in Philadelphia: A secret shopper study.

Margaret Lowenstein, M Holliday Davis, Shoshana V Aronowitz, Emily Seeburger, David Grande

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Margaret LowensteinPerelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania Center for Addiction Medicine and Policy, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: margaw@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
M Holliday DavisPerelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania Center for Addiction Medicine and Policy, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Shoshana V AronowitzLeonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Emily SeeburgerPerelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David GrandePerelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Improving transitions of care for hospitalized patients with opioid use disorderK23DA055087 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Margaret Lowenstein · 2022 to 2026
$959k
Improving access to opioid use disorder treatment among marginalized patients with a tailored telehealth interventionK23DA057528 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Shoshana V. Aronowitz · 2023 to 2026
$855k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA055087NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA057528
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess real-world access to buprenorphine treatment in Philadelphia and measure adoption of policies and practices that facilitate buprenorphine access.

methodsWe used an audit ("secret shopper") design to survey all programs providing longitudinal, outpatient buprenorphine in Philadelphia from 9/2022-1/2023 (n = 130). After validating eligibility, a research coordinator posing as a case manager called eligible programs to inquire about appointment availability and treatment policies. We used descriptive statistics to analyze the data and compared practices between primary and subspecialty treatment providers.

resultsWe reached 107 programs with audit calls (82 % response rate). 56 (52 %) were primary care offices and 51 (48 %) were specialty addiction providers. 96 (90 %) accepted new patients for buprenorphine treatment, and 83 (78 %) accepted insurance. Median time-to-appointment was 3 business days (range 0-120), and 42 % of visits were offered with a single call. Only 42 % of programs could confirm the possibility of a buprenorphine prescription at an initial visit. 48 % of programs could not provide information about requirements for counseling or behavioral health, and few could provide information about policies for patients with ongoing substance use. Specialty models were more likely than primary care programs to provide information about medication availability at the first visit but also were more likely to require counseling and abstinence.

conclusionsOur study provides a simulation of real-world experiences accessing buprenorphine, revealing significant variability in treatment access and persistence of practice-level barriers to treatment. These findings can inform efforts to increase engagement and retention in treatment and better align care with evidence.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineHealth Services AccessibilityNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersHumansLongitudinal StudiesPhiladelphiaPrimary Health CareBuprenorphineNarcotic AntagonistsAudit studyBarriers to treatmentBuprenorphineLow-barrier buprenorphineLow-threshold buprenorphineOpiate use disorderOpioid use disorderTreatment access

Identifiers

PMID39899919
PMCPMC11998989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.