ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2025
Real-world access to buprenorphine treatment in Philadelphia: A secret shopper study.
Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- "The alternative is they're not getting care at all": a qualitative interview study of opioid use disorder treatment providers' perspectives on quality and appropriateness of telehealth for buprenorphine access.Harm reduction journal · 2026Article
- Policy and Payment Factors Influencing Adoption of Low-Barrier Buprenorphine Treatment.JAMA network open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo assess real-world access to buprenorphine treatment in Philadelphia and measure adoption of policies and practices that facilitate buprenorphine access.
methodsWe used an audit ("secret shopper") design to survey all programs providing longitudinal, outpatient buprenorphine in Philadelphia from 9/2022-1/2023 (n = 130). After validating eligibility, a research coordinator posing as a case manager called eligible programs to inquire about appointment availability and treatment policies. We used descriptive statistics to analyze the data and compared practices between primary and subspecialty treatment providers.
resultsWe reached 107 programs with audit calls (82 % response rate). 56 (52 %) were primary care offices and 51 (48 %) were specialty addiction providers. 96 (90 %) accepted new patients for buprenorphine treatment, and 83 (78 %) accepted insurance. Median time-to-appointment was 3 business days (range 0-120), and 42 % of visits were offered with a single call. Only 42 % of programs could confirm the possibility of a buprenorphine prescription at an initial visit. 48 % of programs could not provide information about requirements for counseling or behavioral health, and few could provide information about policies for patients with ongoing substance use. Specialty models were more likely than primary care programs to provide information about medication availability at the first visit but also were more likely to require counseling and abstinence.
conclusionsOur study provides a simulation of real-world experiences accessing buprenorphine, revealing significant variability in treatment access and persistence of practice-level barriers to treatment. These findings can inform efforts to increase engagement and retention in treatment and better align care with evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.