ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2025
Educational technologies for families and children with type 1 diabetes: a scoping review.
Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Transformation of Pediatric Diabetes Care: A Systematic Review and Epistemic Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic, Therapeutic, and Self-Management Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Families' perspectives and the development of an educational program for diabetes in schools.Jornal de pediatriaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo map scientific evidence on educational technologies developed for family members and children with type 1 diabetes.
methodScoping review, according to JBI recommendations, and described in accordance with the checklist PRISMA-ScR. Searches were carried out in the LILACS, BDENF, PUBMED, COCHRANE, CINAHL, EBSCO, Scopus and Embase/Elsevier, Web of Science/Clarivate Analytics, Scielo, VHL Regional Portal and gray literature databases.
resultsFifty-three studies published between 1980 and 2023 were included. The evidence was categorized into digital educational technologies, which provide innovative resources to educate and support children and families, and non-digital educational technologies, which provide practical and interactive opportunities for learning about diabetes.
conclusionThe results highlight the relevance of educational technologies in the care of children with type 1 diabetes. However, they reveal a gap in the assessment of the effectiveness of these interventions in the long term, with regard to adherence to treatment and improvement in quality of life. Research is required to evaluate the effectiveness of these technologies and the impact of educational interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.