Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39899620›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Preventing suicide by restricting access to Highly Hazardous Pesticides (HHPs): A systematic review of international evidence since 2017.

Bruna Rubbo, Chao-Ying Tu, Lucy Barrass, Shu-Sen Chang, Flemming Konradsen, David Gunnell, Michael Eddleston, Chris Metcalfe, Duleeka Knipe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bruna RubboPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1629-8601
Chao-Ying TuDepartment of Psychiatry, National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch, Yunlin, Taiwan.
Lucy BarrassPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6557-1523
Shu-Sen ChangInstitute of Health Behaviors and Community Sciences, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5012-1132
Flemming KonradsenGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
David GunnellPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0829-6470
Michael EddlestonCentre for Pesticide Suicide Prevention and Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Chris MetcalfePopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8318-8907
Duleeka KnipePopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suicide is a leading cause of death worldwide. A previous systematic review showed that regulations limiting access to highly hazardous pesticides (HHPs) were successful in preventing suicides. As the WHO strongly supports regulation of pesticides, we aimed to update and strengthen the evidence on the effectiveness of HHP bans. We conducted a systematic review by searching MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO databases in March 2024 for manuscripts published since 2017 that investigated the effects of regulatory changes limiting access to HHPs on pesticide suicide, at the population level. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, and extracted data using a standardized form, defined a priori. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023441247). All nine studies in six Asian countries showed reductions in pesticide suicide rates following HHP bans (range 28.0% to 91.9%), of which six applied time series analyses to account for trends prior to the intervention (reductions in pesticide suicide rates ranged 28.0% to 60.5%). Only five studies assessed overall suicides; of those, four reported decreases in overall suicide rates following the intervention, of which three used time series analysis (range 7.0% to 45.1%). Only one study had a low risk of bias in all domains, with five studies having high risk of bias in at least one of the domains. Restricting access to HHPs leads to declines in both pesticide and overall suicide rates. Findings from this and the previous systematic review provide strong evidence to governments and public health officials that are considering implementing bans on HHPs in order to reduce suicides. However, this review only covered studies published since 2017 and there is a need for data from other regions to investigate the generalisability of this approach.

Identifiers

PMID39899620
PMCPMC11790168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.