Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39899587›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Multi-level high utility-itemset hiding.

Loan T T Nguyen, Hoa Duong, An Mai, Bay Vo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Loan T T NguyenSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, International University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Hoa DuongSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, International University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3946-4864
An MaiSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, International University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3743-0701
Bay VoFaculty of Information Technology, HUTECH University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2723-1138

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Privacy is as a critical issue in the age of data. Organizations and corporations who publicly share their data always have a major concern that their sensitive information may be leaked or extracted by rivals or attackers using data miners. High-utility itemset mining (HUIM) is an extension to frequent itemset mining (FIM) which deals with business data in the form of transaction databases, data that is also in danger of being stolen. To deal with this, a number of privacy-preserving data mining (PPDM) techniques have been introduced. An important topic in PPDM in the recent years is privacy-preserving utility mining (PPUM). The goal of PPUM is to protect the sensitive information, such as sensitive high-utility itemsets, in transaction databases, and make them undiscoverable for data mining techniques. However, available PPUM methods do not consider the generalization of items in databases (categories, classes, groups, etc.). These algorithms only consider the items at a specialized level, leaving the item combinations at a higher level vulnerable to attacks. The insights gained from higher abstraction levels are somewhat more valuable than those from lower levels since they contain the outlines of the data. To address this issue, this work suggests two PPUM algorithms, namely MLHProtector and FMLHProtector, to operate at all abstraction levels in a transaction database to protect them from data mining algorithms. Empirical experiments showed that both algorithms successfully protect the itemsets from being compromised by attackers.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityData MiningPrivacyAlgorithmsDatabases, FactualHumans

Identifiers

PMID39899587
PMCPMC11790145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.