Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39899520›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Peer effects among friends on students' cognitive abilities: An analysis based on emotional distance.

Wenyi Zhou, Junming Xie, Jinsong Kuang, Yongqing Feng, Dag Øivind Madsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wenyi ZhouXiangNan University School of Economics and Management, Chenzhou, Hunan, China.
Junming XieXiangNan University School of Economics and Management, Chenzhou, Hunan, China.
Jinsong KuangCollege of Economics and Trade, Hunan University of Technology and Business, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0009-0000-8435-5244
Yongqing FengGuizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Dag Øivind MadsenDavis School of Business, Colorado Mesa University, Grand Junction, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8735-3332

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contemporary society, students' cognitive abilities are crucial for the accumulation of human capital. Consequently, significant concern has been expressed regarding the impact of peer effects among friends on students' cognitive abilities. Based on the "China Education Tracking Survey" data, we discuss peer effects among friends on students' cognitive abilities from the perspective of Emotional Distance Analysis. Our study shows that: (1) Students' average scores could be actively affected by the increase in the number of friends with good grades. (2) Peer effects among friends are in accord with different students. Such effects are more easily exerted among female students and those with better average grades or local household registration. (3) The mechanism study found that the conduction effect of peer effects among friends mainly relies on two paths. One is manifested as the "compliance effect". In other words, to align with their friends, students increase their study time, raise their educational aspirations, and minimize instances of skipping classes and absenteeism. The other channel is the "anchoring effect," which involves raising parents' reference standards, leading them to devote more time and energy to their children's learning. Therefore, the rational use of social interaction with friends is a vital approach to enhancing students' cognitive abilities.

Indexed as

CognitionEmotionsFriendsPeer GroupPsychological DistanceStudentsAdolescentChinaFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39899520
PMCPMC11790103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.