Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39899491›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Neuronal oscillations and functional connectivity of paced nostril breathing: A high-density EEG study.

Anita B Frohlich, Flavio Frohlich, Miriam Sklerov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anita B FrohlichDepartment of Neurology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0007-4736-664X
Flavio FrohlichDepartment of Neurology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Miriam SklerovDepartment of Neurology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6031-4763

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Controlling nostril airflow through hand manipulations is an ancient yoga technique that has been suggested to provide targeted modulation of neuronal excitability and regulation of autonomic function, which is known to be lateralized in the brain. Here, we examined if unilateral and alternate nostril breathing differentially impacts brain network oscillations measured by high-density EEG in healthy control participants with no prior experience in breathing techniques. We found that paced nostril breathing both decreased alpha/mu oscillations over central and parietal areas and increased frontal midline and occipital theta oscillations when comparing to spontaneous breathing. Alternate nostril breathing suppressed alpha/mu oscillation more than left nostril breathing. Unilateral nostril breathing resulted in an ipsilateral increase in alpha connectivity while left nostril breathing increased anterior-posterior midline theta connectivity. In contrast to the EEG results, heart rate, heart rate variability, and cognitive performance assessed with a working memory task did not differ significantly by breathing condition. Our results add to the existent literature on nasal breathing by demonstrating changes in cortical oscillations and connectivity during a task that combined slow breathing with manual nasal pathway modulation.

Indexed as

BrainElectroencephalographyNeuronsNoseRespirationAdultFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleYogaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39899491
PMCPMC11790152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.