Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39899441›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025

Modeling and Simulation of Acetaminophen Pharmacokinetics and Hepatic Biomarkers After Overdoses of Extended-Release and Immediate-Release Formulations in Healthy Adults Using the Quantitative Systems Toxicology Software Platform DILIsym.

James J Beaudoin, Kyunghee Yang, Brett A Howell, Zackary Kenz, Vinal V Lakhani, Jeffrey L Woodhead, John C K Lai, Cathy K Gelotte, Sury Sista, Evren Atillasoy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

James J BeaudoinQuantitative Systems Pharmacology Solutions, Simulations Plus Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6926-8844
Kyunghee YangQuantitative Systems Pharmacology Solutions, Simulations Plus Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-7009-0944
Brett A HowellQuantitative Systems Pharmacology Solutions, Simulations Plus Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2815-2084
Zackary KenzQuantitative Systems Pharmacology Solutions, Simulations Plus Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Vinal V LakhaniQuantitative Systems Pharmacology Solutions, Simulations Plus Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Jeffrey L WoodheadQuantitative Systems Pharmacology Solutions, Simulations Plus Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
John C K LaiKenvue Inc., Montgomery Township, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-7628-7469
Cathy K GelotteIndependent Consultant, Westbrook, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0663-2709
Sury SistaKenvue Inc., Montgomery Township, New Jersey, USA.
Evren AtillasoyKenvue Inc., Montgomery Township, New Jersey, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acetaminophen (APAP) has been formulated as immediate-, modified-, and extended-release tablets (APAP-IR, -MR, and -ER, respectively). However, there was concern that APAP-MR previously available in Europe could form a bezoar after a large overdose, leading to delayed absorption and atypical pharmacokinetics (PK) compared to APAP-IR, and that current treatment guidelines developed for APAP overdose to prevent severe hepatotoxicity are inappropriate for APAP-MR. In contrast, APAP-ER caplets available in the United States are designed with an IR layer and an erodible ER layer. Using modeling and simulation, predicted PK and hepatotoxicity biomarkers following various acute overdose and repeated supratherapeutic ingestion (RSTI) scenarios with APAP-IR and APAP-ER were compared to investigate the differences between these two formulations. The existing APAP-IR representation within DILIsym v8A, a quantitative systems toxicology model of drug-induced liver injury, was updated, and an APAP-ER model was developed, using newly acquired in vitro (e.g., tiny-TIMsg) and clinical data. The model and simulated populations (SimPops) representing healthy adults were extensively validated, before simulating PK and three clinically useful hepatic biomarkers after various overdose scenarios. On average, APAP exposure after acute overdose and RSTI in healthy adults was predicted to be slightly lower for APAP-ER compared to APAP-IR, partially due to lower APAP absorption for APAP-ER, while not markedly impacting the expected time course of APAP plasma concentrations. Similar hepatic biomarker profiles were predicted for both APAP formulations. Based on these results, the APAP overdose consensus treatment guidelines updated in 2023 are not further impacted by this report.

Indexed as

AcetaminophenAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticChemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryDrug OverdoseModels, BiologicalAdultBiomarkersComputer SimulationDelayed-Action PreparationsFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansLiverMaleSoftwareYoung AdultAcetaminophenAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticBiomarkersDelayed-Action PreparationsacetaminophenDILIsymGastroPlushepatotoxicitymodeling and simulationparacetamoltiny‐TIMsgTylenol

Identifiers

PMID39899441
PMCPMC12001258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.