Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39899367›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2025

2024 Anal Cancer Screening Guidelines: Analysis of Clinical Performance and Use of High-Resolution Anoscopy in a Large Cohort of Persons With HIV.

Michael Gaisa, Ashish Deshmukh, Keith Sigel, Yuxin Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael GaisaDepartment of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7432-1382
Ashish DeshmukhDepartment of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8936-8108
Keith SigelDepartment of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4051-4861
Yuxin LiuDepartment of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5712-0519

Funding

The effectiveness of screening women with lower genital tract neoplasia or cancers for anal cancer precursorsR01CA256660 · NCI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI CHIAO, ELIZABETH Y., DESHMUKH, ASHISH A. · 2021 to 2025
$4.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA256660NCI NIH HHS R01CA256660
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently published anal cancer screening guidelines recommend 5 strategies for high-risk populations using combinations of cytology and high-risk human papillomavirus testing. Based on data from 1223 persons with human immunodeficiency virus, all triage and cotesting strategies outperformed cytology alone. High-risk human papillomavirus testing improved specificity and reduced high-resolution anoscopy referrals, essential for guideline implementation.

Indexed as

Anus NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHIV InfectionsHuman Papillomavirus DNA TestsProctoscopyTriageAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHIVHuman Papillomavirus VirusesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPapillomavirus Infectionsanal cancer screeninganal cytologyanal high-risk HPV testinganal HSILHIV

Identifiers

PMID39899367
PMCPMC12448577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.