SynthesisInternational journal of hematology2025
Prognostic value of Glasgow prognostic score in hematological malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glasgow Prognostic Score and Gustave Roussy Immune Score in Hodgkin Lymphoma: Survival Associations and Limited Incremental Prognostic Value Beyond the International Prognostic Score.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Pre-treatment endocrine-nutritional signatures predict clinical benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in hematologic malignancies.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) is used to predict the prognosis of several cancers. This first systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the role of GPS in predicting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with hematological malignancies.
methodsEmbase, PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Google Scholar were screened for studies evaluating the prognostic role of GPS in hematological malignancies.
resultsTwelve studies were eligible. Meta-analysis showed that patients with GPS of ≥1 and ≥2 had worse OS than those with GPS of 0. We noted that both GPS scores of ≥1 and ≥2 were associated with significantly poor PFS in patients with hematological malignancies. Results remained robust on sensitivity analysis.
conclusionGPS can be used as a predictor of OS and PFS in patients with hematological malignancies. High GPS scores can lead to a twofold higher risk of poor OS and PFS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39899232What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.