Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39899198›Full record

ArticleAmbio2025

Past and present marine citizen science around the globe: A cumulative inventory of initiatives and data produced.

Uta Wehn, Ane Bilbao Erezkano, Luke Somerwill, Torsten Linders, Joan Maso, Stephen Parkinson, Christina Semasingha, Sasha Woods

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Uta WehnIHE Delft, Westvest 7, 2611, Delft, AX, The Netherlands. u.wehn@un-ihe.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1420-9721
Ane Bilbao ErezkanoIHE Delft, Westvest 7, 2611, Delft, AX, The Netherlands.
Luke SomerwillUniversity of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, Room number: C 6.00, 1001 NH, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Torsten LindersDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Joan MasoCREAF. Edifici C. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain.
Stephen ParkinsonEarthwatch Europe, 256 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 7DE, UK.
Christina SemasinghaIHE Delft, Westvest 7, 2611, Delft, AX, The Netherlands.
Sasha WoodsEarthwatch Europe, 256 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 7DE, UK.

Funding

European Commission 101037643European Commission 101086421European Commission 101133983
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marine environment is facing serious changes. This requires scientific understanding of the ocean's responses to pressures and management actions to provide the foundation for sustainable development. At the same time, the production of knowledge for a more sustainable world is undergoing rapid change with the uptake of citizen science as means of opening up science. While there is increasing interest in marine citizen science, it is also often conceived as lagging behind citizen science in other areas, such as biodiversity related citizen science on land. This paper analyses empirical evidence collected >1260 past and present marine citizen science initiatives, substantiating the pervasiveness of marine citizen science around the globe. In doing so, it provides the basis for a cumulative inventory of MArine Citizen Science Initiatives (MARCSI) that can inform and shape both the growing community of marine citizen science practitioners and the science of citizen science.

Indexed as

Citizen ScienceConservation of Natural ResourcesMarine BiologyBiodiversityOceans and SeasFAIRInventoryMarine citizen scienceOceanOpenSustainability

Identifiers

PMID39899198
PMCPMC12055671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.