ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Unraveling the heterogeneity of WHO grade 4 gliomas: insights from clinical, imaging, and molecular characterization.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association between time to surgery and survival in patients with initially diagnosed WHO 2021 grade 4 gliomas.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe 2021 WHO classification of central nervous system tumors introduced molecular criteria to stratify Grade 4 gliomas, which remain heterogeneous. This study aims to elucidate the clinical, radiological, and molecular characteristics of WHO Grade 4 gliomas, focusing on their prognostic implications and the development of a predictive model for astrocytoma IDH-mutant WHO Grade 4 (A4).
methodsA retrospective cohort of 223 patients from Beijing Tiantan Hospital was analyzed. Clinical, radiological, and histopathological data were combined with molecular profiling, focusing on IDH mutations, TERT promoter mutations, and MGMT methylation. A predictive model was developed using LASSO regression to distinguish A4 from glioblastomas and validated with an external dataset from UCSF.
resultsThe cohort included 201 glioblastomas (90.1%) and 22 A4 cases (9.9%). A4 tumors were associated with younger age, higher MGMT promoter methylation, lower rates of TERT mutations, and distinct radiological features, such as cortical non-enhancing tumor infiltration (CnCE). Patients with A4 demonstrated significantly better survival outcomes compared to glioblastoma patients (p < 0.001). The predictive model for A4, incorporating age, tumor margin, and CnCE, achieved an AUC of 0.890 in the training set and 0.951 in the validation set.
conclusionIntegrating molecular and clinical criteria improves prognostication in Grade 4 gliomas. The predictive model developed in this study effectively identifies A4 tumors, facilitating more personalized therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.