ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2025
Surgical outcomes of non-fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling using a double-staining technique for symptomatic myopic foveoschisis: a retrospective study.
Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the incidence of postoperative macular hole (MH), visual acuity, and anatomical recovery in patients who underwent a non-fovea-sparing technique using a double-staining method for symptomatic myopic foveoschisis without pre-existing macular holes. STUDY
designA retrospective study.
methodsWe evaluated 39 eyes from 39 consecutive patients diagnosed with myopic foveoschisis from May 2017 to September 2022 at Fujita Health University Hospital. All patients underwent non-fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling using a double-staining method and were monitored for 6 months postoperatively. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) as measured by the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), central retinal thickness (CRT), and the presence of foveoschisis were assessed using optical coherence tomography (OCT) preoperatively (pre) and at 1 month (1 M), 3 months (3 M), and 6 months (6 M) postoperatively.
resultsNo cases of postoperative rhegmatogenous retinal detachment were observed. A postoperative MH developed in one eye. The mean logMAR values at pre, 1 M, 3 M, and 6 M were 0.38 ± 0.37, 0.23 ± 0.33, 0.18 ± 0.25, and 0.13 ± 0.29, respectively (all P < 0.001). The mean CRTs at pre, 1 M, 3 M, and 6 M were 384.6 ± 177.2, 262.2 ± 84.4, 200.3 ± 64.9, and 185.6 ± 61.0 μm, respectively (all P < 0.001). Foveoschisis was observed in all 39 eyes (100%) preoperatively and in 17 eyes (43.6%) at 1 M, nine eyes (34.6%) at 3 M, and zero eyes (0%) at 6 M postoperatively.
conclusionThe non-fovea-sparing double-staining technique was effective in treating myopic foveoschisis without MH, leading to significant improvements in both visual function and anatomical recovery. This method may be a promising surgical option for managing myopic foveoschisis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39899177What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.