Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39899162›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025

Patient-reported outcomes after immediate and delayed DIEP-flap breast reconstruction in the setting of post-mastectomy radiation therapy-results of the multicenter UMBRELLA breast cancer cohort.

Britt A M Jansen, Claudia A Bargon, Maria A Bouman, Dieuwke R Mink van der Molen, Emily L Postma, Femke van der Leij, Erik Zonnevylle, Quinten Ruhe, Sven E Bruekers, Wiesje Maarse and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Britt A M JansenDivision of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Cancer Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands. br.jansen@antoniusziekenhuis.nl.
Claudia A BargonDivision of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Cancer Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maria A BoumanDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Dieuwke R Mink van der MolenDivision of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Cancer Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Emily L PostmaDepartment of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Soestwetering 1, 3543 AZ, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Femke van der LeijDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Cancer Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Erik ZonnevylleDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Quinten RuheDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Sven E BruekersDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Zeist, The Netherlands.
Wiesje MaarseDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sabine SieslingDepartment of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Danny A Young-AfatDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Annemiek Doeksen *Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Soestwetering 1, 3543 AZ, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Helena M Verkooijen *Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Cancer Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
UMBRELLA study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTiming of Deep Inferior Epigastric artery Perforator (DIEP)-flap breast reconstruction in the context of post-mastectomy radiotherapy for breast cancer patients is topic of debate. We compared the impact of immediate (before radiotherapy) versus delayed (after radiotherapy) DIEP-flap breast reconstruction (IBR versus DBR) on short- and long-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

methodsWithin the prospective, multicenter breast cancer cohort (UMBRELLA), we identified 88 women who underwent immediate or delayed DIEP-flap breast reconstruction and received PMRT. At 6 and 12 months post-mastectomy, as well as on long-term (≥ 12 months post-reconstruction) body image, breast symptoms, physical functioning, and pain were measured by EORTC-QLQ-30/BR23. Additionally, long-term evaluation included satisfaction with breast(s), physical well-being and self-reported adverse effects of radiation as measured by BREAST-Q, and late treatment toxicity. PROs were compared between groups using independent sample T-test.

resultsIBR was performed in 56 patients (64%) and DBR in 32 patients (36%), with 15 months of median time to reconstruction. At 6 and 12 months post-mastectomy, better body image and physical functioning were observed after IBR. No statistically nor clinically relevant differences were observed in long-term EORTC and BREAST-Q outcomes (median follow-up 37-41 months for IBR vs. 42-46 months for DBR). Patients with IBR reported more fibrosis and movement restriction (median follow-up 29 vs. 61 months, resp.).

conclusionLong-term PROs were comparable for patients with IBR and DBR, despite more patient-reported fibrosis and movement restriction after IBR. Therefore, both treatment pathways can be considered when opting for autologous breast reconstruction in the setting of PMRT.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammaplastyPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPerforator FlapAdultAgedEpigastric ArteriesFemaleHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeBreast cancerDIEP-flap breast reconstructionLate radiation toxicityOncoplastic breast surgeryPatient-reported outcome

Identifiers

PMID39899162
PMCPMC11953195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.