Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39899161›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025

Pathologic complete response rates of patients with ER-low/HER2-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in the neo-real study.

Renata Colombo Bonadio, Monique Celeste Tavares, Flávia Cavalcanti Balint, Isadora Martins de Sousa, Ana Carolina Marin Comini, Fernanda Madasi, Jose Bines, Rafael Dal Ponte Ferreira, Daniela Dornelles Rosa, Candice Lima Santos and 14 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Renata Colombo BonadioInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa E Ensino (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil.
Monique Celeste TavaresA.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Flávia Cavalcanti BalintA.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Isadora Martins de SousaA.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Carolina Marin CominiA.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernanda MadasiInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa E Ensino (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Jose BinesGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos Em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Rafael Dal Ponte FerreiraServiço de Oncologia, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Daniela Dornelles RosaGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos Em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Candice Lima SantosInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa E Ensino (IDOR), Recife, Brazil.
Zenaide Silva de SouzaMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Brasília, Brazil.
Daniele Assad-SuzukiGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos Em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Júlio Antônio Pereira de AraújoGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos Em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Débora de Melo GagliatoGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos Em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Carlos Henrique Dos AnjosGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos Em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Bruna M ZucchettiGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos Em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Anezka FerrariDASA Oncology, Hospital Santa Paula, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mayana Lopes de BritoGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos Em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Renata CangussuGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos Em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Marcela Fernandes MonteiroInstituto Do Câncer Do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Paulo M HoffInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa E Ensino (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil.
Laura TestaInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa E Ensino (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Del Pilar Estevez-DizInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa E Ensino (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil.
Romualdo Barroso-SousaGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos Em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil. romualdo.sousa.ext@dasa.com.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEstrogen receptor-low (ER-low) breast cancer (BC) present clinicopathological features and disease behavior resembling triple-negative breast cancer, but have been frequently excluded from pivotal trials designed for the latter. Since neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (P + CT) is the new standard of care for stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), we aimed to access the effectiveness of this therapy for ER-low tumors.

methodsWe evaluated patients with ER-low BC included in the Neo-Real/ GBECAM-0123 study, a real-world data study evaluating patients treated with neoadjuvant P + CT since July 2020 across ten cancer centers. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of neoadjuvant P + CT through pathologic complete response (pCR).

resultsTwenty patients were included in this analysis. Median age was 40 years (range 28-64). Most patients had grade 3 tumors (n = 18, 90%), with a median Ki67 index of 75% (range 30-95%), and 70% had stage II tumors. All the twenty patients were submitted to surgery, with a pCR observed in 12 cases (pCR rate of 60%). Receiving less than 6 cycles of pembrolizumab was associated with a trend towards worse pCR rates (20% vs 73.3%).

conclusionsThe clinicopathological features and the response to neoadjuvant P + CT observed in this ER-low BC cohort are similar to that observed in TNBC. Patients with stage II-III ER-low/HER2- BC should be treated with neoadjuvant P + CT following the treatment standards for TNBC, and proper adherence to the regimen is relevant to improve effectiveness.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAdultErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPathologic Complete ResponseReceptors, EstrogenTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasespembrolizumabReceptors, EstrogenBreast cancerER-lowImmunotherapyNeoadjuvant

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.