ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2025
Theoretical study on fused 1,2,3,4-tetrazine-1,3-dinitroxide derivatives under external electric field.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextConsidering the excellent properties of 1,2,3,4-tetrazine-1,3-dinitroxides, several types of energetic derivatives have been synthesized from them. Among them, [1,2,5] oxadiazolo [3,4-e] [1,2,3,4]-tetrazine-4,6-Di-N-dioxide (FTDO), 5,7-dinitrobenzo-1,2,3,4-tetrazine-1,3-nitrogen dioxide (DTND), and [1,2,3,4] tetrazino [5,6-e] [1,2,3,4] tetrazine-1,3,8-tetraoxide (TTTO) are considered excellent energetic materials. However, there is limited research on their behavior under electric fields. The effect of electric fields was studied using density functional theory to calculate trigger bond changes, strain energy, chemical reactivity, and surface electrostatic potential. The results indicate that the planar structure of FTDO is more unique than that of DTND and TTTO, and its trigger bond is located at special position. Increased electric field strength can lengthen the trigger bond, increase sensitivity, and reduce strain energy of FTDO. Under a positive electric field, DTND and TTTO have longer trigger bond lengths, increased sensitivity, and increased strain energy, while exhibiting the opposite behavior under a negative electric field. Electric fields can affect the chemical reactivity of the all three derivatives. FTDO is less active under positive electric fields, DTND is more active under both electric fields, and TTTO becomes more active under negative electric fields. Finally, the electric field can expand their absorption spectrum range, affecting electron transfer between fragments.
methodsAll calculations in this article were completed on Gaussian 16 software. The calculation levels are B3LYP/6-311G**, B3LYP/Def2-TZVPP, and PBE1PBE/6-311G**. Multiwfn and VMD were used for wave function analysis. Electric fields have a strength range of - 0.02 to 0.02 a.u., with a growth gradient of 0.01 a.u.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39899155What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.