Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39899150›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2025

Multiple combinatorial interactions among natural structural variants of Brassica SOC1 promoters and SVP: conservation of binding affinity despite diversity in bimolecular interactions.

Simran Kaur, Rinki Sisodia, Bharat Gupta, Kishor Gaikwad, Chaithanya Madhurantakam, Anandita Singh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Simran KaurDepartment of Biotechnology, Brassica Developmental Biology Laboratory, TERI School of Advanced Studies, 10 Institutional Area, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, Delhi, 110070, India.
Rinki SisodiaDepartment of Biotechnology, Structural and Molecular Biology Laboratory (SMBL), TERI School of Advanced Studies, 10 Institutional Area, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, Delhi, 110070, India.
Bharat GuptaDepartment of Biotechnology, Brassica Developmental Biology Laboratory, TERI School of Advanced Studies, 10 Institutional Area, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, Delhi, 110070, India.
Kishor GaikwadPrincipal Scientist, National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, LBS Centre, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Chaithanya MadhurantakamDepartment of Biotechnology, Structural and Molecular Biology Laboratory (SMBL), TERI School of Advanced Studies, 10 Institutional Area, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, Delhi, 110070, India. chaithanya.madhurantakam@terisas.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1967-8538
Anandita SinghDepartment of Biotechnology, Brassica Developmental Biology Laboratory, TERI School of Advanced Studies, 10 Institutional Area, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, Delhi, 110070, India. asingh@terisas.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4568-7331

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India (BT/PR24047/BPA/118/364/2017)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnalysis of binding patterns of biomolecules underpin new paradigms for trait engineering. One way of designing early flowering crops is to manipulate genes controlling flowering time. SOC1, a central integrator of flowering, is downregulated by SVP. In amphidiploid Brassica juncea, flowering is plausibly mediated by combinatorial interactions involving natural variants of SOC1 promoter and SVP protein homologs. Although fluctuating temperatures influence energetics of molecular interactions and phenotypes, mechanistic insights on these remain unknown. Herein, we report diversity in 50 homologs of SVP proteins from 25 Brassicaceae species. MATERIALS AND METHODS AND

resultsSequence and phylogenetic analysis of 9 natural variants of B. juncea SVP revealed differences in MIKC domains and sub-genome of origin. Generation and refinement of 15 SVP protein models (natural and hypothetical) using I-TASSER and ALPHAFOLD, and 3 SOC1 promoter fragments using 3D-DART, revealed structural diversity. Notwithstanding, binding affinity of 48 docked complexes analysed using HADDOCK and PreDBA were similar. Analysis of 27 docked complexes for distribution of shared or unique binding patterns and type of molecular contacts (π-π stacking, hydrophobic interactions, Van-der-Waals forces, H-bonds) using PyMOL, CCP4i, DNAproDB, PremPDI and DIMPLOT revealed extensive variation implicating compensatory mutations in preserving binding affinity. Yeast one-hybrid assays validated binding potential predicted in docked complexes. Conserved amino-acid and nucleotide residues involved in non-covalent interactions were identified. Computational alanine substitution established cruciality of amino-acid hotspots conferring stability to docked complexes.

conclusionsOur study is important as identification of crucial amino-acid hotspots is essential for rational protein design. Targeted mutagenesis resulting in modified binding spectrum of regulatory proteins suggests a way forward for trait engineering.

Indexed as

BrassicaMADS Domain ProteinsPlant ProteinsFlowersGene Expression Regulation, PlantMolecular Docking SimulationPhylogenyPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingMADS Domain ProteinsPlant ProteinsCrop engineeringDockingFloweringHomeologsPolyploidyY1H

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.