ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2025
Supporting Long-Term Meaningful Outcomes in Stroke Rehabilitation.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- 'Some of Them Were Created by People Who Have Never Had a Stroke': Understanding Desired Physical and Occupational Therapy Research Study Features for People With Chronic Stroke.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Human-AI co-research on design and evaluation of Embodied Conversational Agent in rehabilitation contexts.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2026Article
- Functional Cognitive Rehabilitation as a Primer to Activity-Based Stroke Telerehabilitation: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Engagement.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Co-designing and testing a management programme with peer support for post-stroke fatigue: Nottingham fatigue after stroke study (NotFAST3).Clinical rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Rehabilitation training robot using mirror therapy for the upper and lower limb after stroke: a prospective cohort study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewRehabilitation is the mainstay of recovery after stroke, but key recommendations focused on delivering 'as much therapy as possible' and stroke survivor outcome measures have remained relatively unchanged for decades. Traditional therapy approaches focus on maximum improvement of physical impairments while a stroke survivor is in hospital to ensure that community discharge can be deemed 'safe'. This narrow approach sidelines the outcomes that are meaningful to the stroke survivor in the long term and the challenges they may face within their social context. In this article, we highlight the importance of the whole-person approach and review recent research introducing novel considerations to optimise outcomes after stroke. RECENT
findingsPsychosocial well-being is a major component of health but is poorly acknowledged and managed for stroke survivors. Evidence supports the use of self-management interventions, peer befriending, and culturally - responsive methods, including deep engagement with Indigenous and cultural knowledge. Cultural safety and involvement of a stroke survivor's important personal connections are also vital for achieving truly person-centred care and equity in rehabilitation outcomes. Outcomes in rehabilitation will be optimised if we shift our mindsets from a sole focus on improving physical impairments to a broader scope of delivering whole-person care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39899076What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.