Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39899076›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2025

Supporting Long-Term Meaningful Outcomes in Stroke Rehabilitation.

Vivian Fu, Stephanie Thompson, Nicola Kayes, Felicity Bright

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vivian FuCalgary Stroke Program, Dept of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. vivian.fu@ucalgary.ca.
Stephanie ThompsonTe Whatu Ora - Capital Coast and Hutt Valley, Older Adults, Rehabilitation, and Allied Health Service, Lower Hutt, New Zealand.
Nicola KayesCentre for Person Centred Research, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Aotearoa, Auckland, New Zealand.
Felicity BrightCentre for Person Centred Research, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Aotearoa, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewRehabilitation is the mainstay of recovery after stroke, but key recommendations focused on delivering 'as much therapy as possible' and stroke survivor outcome measures have remained relatively unchanged for decades. Traditional therapy approaches focus on maximum improvement of physical impairments while a stroke survivor is in hospital to ensure that community discharge can be deemed 'safe'. This narrow approach sidelines the outcomes that are meaningful to the stroke survivor in the long term and the challenges they may face within their social context. In this article, we highlight the importance of the whole-person approach and review recent research introducing novel considerations to optimise outcomes after stroke. RECENT

findingsPsychosocial well-being is a major component of health but is poorly acknowledged and managed for stroke survivors. Evidence supports the use of self-management interventions, peer befriending, and culturally - responsive methods, including deep engagement with Indigenous and cultural knowledge. Cultural safety and involvement of a stroke survivor's important personal connections are also vital for achieving truly person-centred care and equity in rehabilitation outcomes. Outcomes in rehabilitation will be optimised if we shift our mindsets from a sole focus on improving physical impairments to a broader scope of delivering whole-person care.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationHumansTreatment OutcomeCultural safetyPerson-centred carePsychosocial well-beingStroke rehabilitationSupported self-managementTake Charge

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.