SynthesisLasers in medical science2025
Safety parameters of diode laser therapy for the treatment of recurrent aphthous ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Laser therapy versus placebo treatment for aphthous ulcers: a systematic review and meta‑analysis.Lasers in medical science · 2025Pooled it
- Identification of Critical Genes for Recurrent Aphthous Ulcer by Transcriptome Data Analysis and Mendelian Randomization.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2026Article
- Non-Thermal Plasma vs. Low-Level Laser Therapy for Recurrent Oral Ulcers: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Photobiomodulation in the management of oral lesions: a targeted, evidence-based approach.Brazilian oral research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety parameters of diode laser (DL) therapy on treating recurrent aphthous ulcer (RAU). We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Studies from PubMed, Embase, WOS, Cochrane, Google Scholar, CNKI, Wanfang Data and VIP were searched by hand. The search terms encompassed both Medical Subject Headings terms (Stomatitis, aphthous; Lasers, semiconductor) and their corresponding text words. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4. 16 studies were included in this review with no high-risk studies and no significant publication bias. In this review, we found DL therapy was more effective than medication or placebo in reducing Visual Analog Scale (MD = 2.79, 95% CI: 1.40 to 4.17, P < 0.0001), shrinking ulcer size (MD = 2.62, 95% CI: 1.15 to 4.09, P = 0.0005) and accelerating healing time (MD = -3.72, 95% CI: -4.86 to -2.59, P < 0.00001). Moreover, subgroup analyses demonstrated that DL therapy effectively alleviated immediate pain in patients (MD = 2.88, 95% CI: 1.53 to 4.23, P < 0.0001), and a single exposure significantly shortened the healing time of RAU (MD = -4.20, 95% CI: -5.76 to -2.64, P < 0.00001). DL therapy is an effective treatment for RAU without any adverse effects. A single session (or two) with low-energy density irradiation significantly alleviates RAU symptoms. Consequently, there is no need to pursue longer durations and higher parameters of DL therapy, which also aligns with the economic interests of patients. RAU is typically painful and can impair quality of life. Suitable DL therapy represents a promising strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39899066What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.