Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39899047›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2025

Stimulator of interferon genes (STING) immunohistochemical expression in fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma: biological and potential predictive implications.

S Marletta, L Marcolini, A Caliò, S Pedron, P Antonini, F M Martelli, L Stefanizzi, G Martignoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

S Marletta *Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Largo L. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
L Marcolini *Department of Pathology, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy.
A CaliòDepartment of Diagnostic and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Largo L. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
S PedronDepartment of Diagnostic and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Largo L. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
P AntoniniDepartment of Diagnostic and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Largo L. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
F M MartelliDepartment of Diagnostic and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Largo L. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
L StefanizziDepartment of Pathology, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy.
G MartignoniDepartment of Diagnostic and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Largo L. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy. guido.martignoni@univr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7761-7274

Funding

Bando di ricerca finalizzata 2021 GR-2021-12374462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fumarate hydratase (FH)-deficient renal cell carcinoma is an aggressive neoplasm driven by inactivating mutations of the FH gene, which cause metabolites like S-(2-succinyl)cysteine (2SC) to accumulate and trigger cascades supporting malignant transformation. Although in preclinical models the c-GAS-STING pathway is activated by fumarate metabolites, its role in humans has not been explored yet. Eleven FH-deficient renal cell carcinomas, including primary neoplasms and metastases, were retrieved and evaluated for clinical-pathological features and immunohistochemical expression of FH, 2SC (commercially available), and STING. The in-house collection accounted for 0.2% of the 2011-2023 renal cell carcinomas cohort (5/2210). Eight-on-ten cases with available follow-up behaved aggressively (local recurrence/distant metastases). All tumors revealed FH staining loss and strong and diffuse 2SC immunolabeling. At least focal STING expression was detected in most primary tumors (9/11, 82%), often (78%) in a wide percentage of cells (≥ 30%). Notably, significant STING expression was observed in all but two aggressive renal neoplasms, with one of the remaining showing increased staining in its hepatic localization, and in 86% (6/7) of neoplasms significantly expressing PD-L1. In our series, (i) FH-deficient renal cell carcinoma represents 0.2% of in-house cases; (ii) combining FH loss and positive 2SC staining now commercially available is useful in primary and secondary tumors, supporting this latter marker's safe routine adoption; and (iii) a significant STING labeling (≥ 30%) in most of the samples, especially in those behaving aggressively and expressing PD-L1, provides novel insights regarding the molecular basis of FH-deficient renal cell carcinomas, proposing STING as a potential predictive marker.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Renal CellFumarate HydrataseKidney NeoplasmsMembrane ProteinsAdultAgedFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedSTING ProteinBiomarkers, TumorFumarate HydrataseMembrane ProteinsSTING1 protein, humanSTING Protein2SCFumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinomaPD-L1STING

Identifiers

PMID39899047
PMCPMC12546389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.