Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39899034›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2025

Are contemporary antifungal doses sufficient for critically ill patients? Outcomes from an international, multicenter pharmacokinetics study for Screening Antifungal Exposure in Intensive Care Units-the SAFE-ICU study.

Jason A Roberts, Fekade B Sime, Jeffrey Lipman, María Patricia Hernández-Mitre, João Pedro Baptista, Roger J Brüggemann, Jai Darvall, Jan J De Waele, George Dimopoulos, Jean-Yves Lefrant and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03136926 (An International, Multi-centre Prospective Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Antifungal Drug Exposure in Intensive Care Unit Patients Receiving Conventional Dosing Regimens), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03136926 unknown statusnot on this map

An International, Multi-centre Prospective Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Antifungal Drug Exposure in Intensive Care Unit Patients Receiving Conventional Dosing Regimens

TypeobservationalSponsorThe University of QueenslandRan2017 to 2018Enrolled150ConditionsAntifungal Agents
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Challenges and opportunities in the management of severe pneumonia. Key concepts from the Seventh Annual Meeting of Spanish Experts 2025.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Temporal changes in fungal epidemiology in ICU post-operative peritonitis cases.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Jason A RobertsUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Building 71/918 Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Campus, Herston, Brisbane, Australia. j.roberts@uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6218-435X
Fekade B SimeUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Building 71/918 Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Campus, Herston, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4061-2063
Jeffrey LipmanUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Building 71/918 Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Campus, Herston, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5965-9876
María Patricia Hernández-MitreUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Building 71/918 Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Campus, Herston, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3565-0292
João Pedro BaptistaDepartment of Intensive Care, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6790-806X
Roger J BrüggemannDepartment of Pharmacy and Radboudumc Institute for Medical Innovation, And Radboudumc/CWZ Center of Expertise in Mycology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7618-725X
Jai DarvallDepartment of Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0579-8931
Jan J De WaeleDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1017-9748
George DimopoulosHead of 3rd Department of Critical Care, EVGENIDIO Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3784-3103
Jean-Yves LefrantUR-UM103 IMAGINE, Univ Montpellier, Division of Anesthesia Critical Care, Pain and Emergency Medicine, Nîmes University Hospital, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7774-2497
Mohd Basri Mat NorKulliyyah of Medicine, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan Campus, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia.
Jordi RelloUR-UM103 IMAGINE, Univ Montpellier, Division of Anesthesia Critical Care, Pain and Emergency Medicine, Nîmes University Hospital, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0676-6210
Leonardo SeoaneFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, New Orleans, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9262-6673
Monica A SlavinNational Centre for Infections in Cancer and Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8443-314X
Miia ValkonenIntensive Care Medicine, Department of Perioperative, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Mario VendittiDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, University "Sapienza" of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2639-0281
Giancarlo CeccarelliDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, University of Rome "Sapienza" and University Hospital Umberto I, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5921-3180
Wai Tat WongDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Markus ZeitlingerDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1873-3953
Claire RogerUR-UM103 IMAGINE, Univ Montpellier, Division of Anesthesia Critical Care, Pain and Emergency Medicine, Nîmes University Hospital, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6055-0034

Funding

Gilead Australia Fellowship 14500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAppropriate antifungal therapy is a major determinant of survival in critically ill patients with invasive fungal disease. We sought to describe whether contemporary dosing of antifungals achieves therapeutic exposures in critically ill patients.

methodsIn a prospective, open-label, multicenter pharmacokinetic study, intensive care unit (ICU) patients prescribed azoles, echinocandins, or polyene antifungals for treatment or prophylaxis of invasive fungal disease were enrolled. Blood samples were collected on two occasions, with three samples taken during a single dosing interval on each occasion. Total concentrations were centrally measured using validated chromatographic methods. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using noncompartmental methods. Antifungal dosing adequacy was assessed using predefined PK/PD targets.

resultsWe included 339 patients from 30 ICUs across 12 countries. Median age 62 (interquartile range [IQR], 51-70) years, median APACHE II score 22 (IQR, 17-28), and 61% males. Antifungal therapy was primarily prescribed for treatment (80.8%). Fluconazole was the most frequently prescribed antifungal (40.7%). The most common indication for treatment was intra-abdominal infection (30.7%). Fungi were identified in 45% of patients, of which only 26% had a minimum inhibitory concentration available. Target attainment was higher for patients receiving prophylaxis (> 80% for most drugs). For patients receiving treatment, low target attainment was noted for voriconazole (57.1%), posaconazole (63.2%), micafungin (64.1%) and amphotericin B (41.7%).

conclusionThis study highlights the varying degrees of target attainment across antifungal agents in critically ill patients. While a significant proportion of patients achieved the predefined PK/PD targets, wide variability and subtherapeutic exposures persist.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03136926, 2017-04-21.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCritical IllnessInvasive Fungal InfectionsAgedAzolesEchinocandinsFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAntifungal AgentsAzolesEchinocandinsAntifungalsCritically illIntensive care unitInvasive fungal diseasePharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID39899034
PMCPMC11903579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.