Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39899002›Full record

ArticleMedical optical imaging and virtual microscopy image analysis : first International Workshop, MOVI 2022, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2022, Singapore, September 18, 2022, Proceedings. MOVI (Workshop) (1st : 2022 : Singapore)2022

Profiling DNA damage in 3D Histology Samples.

Kristofer E Delas Peñas, Ralf Haeusler, Sally Feng, Valentin Magidson, Mariia Dmitrieva, David Wink, Stephen Lockett, Robert Kinders, Jens Rittscher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical optical imaging and virtual microscopy image analysis : first International Workshop, MOVI 2022, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2022, Singapore, September 18, 2022, Proceedings. MOVI (Workshop) (1st : 2022 : Singapore), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Beyond DNA damage: 3D tumor models and the integrin mechanobiology of radioresistance.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kristofer E Delas PeñasDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Ralf HaeuslerDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sally FengFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, USA.
Valentin MagidsonFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, USA.
Mariia DmitrievaDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
David WinkCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, USA.
Stephen LockettFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, USA.
Robert KindersFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, USA.
Jens RittscherDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201500003CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201500003IWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The morphology of individual cells can reveal much about the underlying states and mechanisms in biology. In tumor environments, the interplay among different cell morphologies in local neighborhoods can further improve this characterization. In this paper, we present an approach based on representation learning to capture similarities and subtle differences in cells positive for

Indexed as

3D histologycell morphologyDNA damagerepresentation learning

Identifiers

PMID39899002
PMCPMC7617225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.