ArticleACS synthetic biology2025
Characterization of Rationally Designed CRISPR/Cas9-Based DNA Methyltransferases with Distinct Methyltransferase and Gene Silencing Activities in Human Cell Lines and Primary Human T Cells.
Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A system-level metastable model of cancer evolution: integrating replication stress, cell cycle deregulation and chromosomal instability.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Programmable CRISPRtune dissects the transcriptional repressive activity of MeCP2.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- CRISPR/Cas‑based epigenome editing for osteogenic lineage commitment.Cell and tissue research · 2026Review
- Clinical translation of epigenome editing technologies.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Comprehensive profiling of CRISPR/dCas9 epigenome editors indicates a complex link between on and off target effects.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Reversing transgene silencing via targeted chromatin editing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nuclease-deactivated Cas (dCas) proteins can be used to recruit epigenetic effectors, and this class of epigenetic editing technologies has revolutionized the ability to synthetically control the mammalian epigenome and transcriptome. DNA methylation is one of the most important and well-characterized epigenetic modifications in mammals, and while many different forms of dCas-based DNA methyltransferases (dCas-DNMTs) have been developed for programmable DNA methylation, these tools are frequently poorly tolerated and/or lowly expressed in mammalian cell types. Further, the use of dCas-DNMTs has largely been restricted to cell lines, which limits mechanistic insights in karyotypically normal contexts and hampers translational utility in the longer term. Here, we extend previous insights into the rational design of the catalytic core of the mammalian DNMT3A methyltransferase and test three dCas9-DNMT3A/3L variants across different human cell lines and in primary donor-derived human T cells. We find that mutations within the catalytic core of DNMT3A stabilize the expression of dCas9-DNMT3A/3L fusion proteins in Jurkat T cells without sacrificing DNA methylation or gene-silencing performance. We also show that these rationally engineered mutations in DNMT3A alter DNA methylation profiles at loci targeted with dCas9-DNMT3A/3L in cell lines and donor-derived human T cells. Finally, we leverage the transcriptionally repressive effects of dCas9-DNMT3A/3L variants to functionally link the expression of a key immunomodulatory transcription factor to cytokine secretion in donor-derived T cells. Overall, our work expands the synthetic biology toolkit for epigenetic editing and provides a roadmap for the use of engineered dCas-based DNMTs in primary mammalian cell types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.