Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39898360›Full record

ArticleAdvances in ophthalmology practice and research

Real-world assessment of second-generation trabecular micro-bypass stents in open-angle glaucoma patients.

Vishal Vohra, Indira Madgula, Harshika Chawla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in ophthalmology practice and research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vishal VohraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, United Kingdom.
Indira MadgulaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, United Kingdom.
Harshika ChawlaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To assess the safety and efficacy of iStent inject placement in individuals with glaucoma with open angles in real world clinical settings. Methods: A review was conducted on the medical records of individuals who received iStent inject implants starting from March 2018. The analysis focused on reductions in intraocular pressure (IOP) and glaucoma medication usage. Safety assessments encompassed intraoperative and postoperative issues, additional surgeries, and improvements in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Results: Analysis of 55 eyes of 48 patients that underwent iStent implantation revealed a mean age of 77 years (range: 51-97). The initial average intraocular pressure (IOP) in these eyes was 20.2 ​± ​6.4 ​mm Hg. Following surgery, IOP decreased by ​≥ ​20% compared to preoperative levels in 21 eyes (43.8%) over the 12-month follow-up period. Notably, there was a significant reduction in medication usage by the 12-month mark ( Conclusions: The findings from the 12-month follow-up of iStent inject implants in standard clinical settings demonstrate a notable decrease in both intraocular pressure (IOP) and medication usage in eyes with concurrent open-angle glaucoma.

Indexed as

GlaucomaIntraocular pressureiStent inject

Identifiers

PMID39898360
PMCPMC11787460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.