ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2025
Comparison of lifetime attributable risk of post-irradiation secondary cancer of boron neutron capture therapy, proton beam therapy, and X-ray therapy for pediatric and adolescent and young adult patients.
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: This study aimed to compare the post-irradiation secondary cancer rates of boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT), proton beam therapy (PBT), and X-ray therapy (XT) in pediatric and Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) patients with intracranial lesions. Materials and methods: BNCT, PBT, and XT plans were optimized for nine pediatric and AYA patients with intracranial lesions. The BNCT dose calculation results were biologically effective dose converted. Lifetime attributable risk (LAR) was calculated using a calculation model proposed by Schneider Results: Statistically significant differences between BNCT vs PBT and XT were confirmed for the brain, bone, soft tissue, and cumulative (P < 0.0001). Significant differences were also observed in PBT and XT, with P < 0.0001 for brain and cumulative, P = 0.0002 for bone, and P = 0.0281 for soft tissue. The cumulative NNT for BNCT vs. PBT, BNCT vs. XT, and PBT vs. XT were 162, 78.6, and 153, respectively. Conclusion: BNCT had a significantly lower LAR compared to PBT and XT. These findings suggest the usefulness of BNCT in pediatric and AYA patients with brain tumors from the perspective of post-irradiation secondary cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.