ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2025
Associations of dose to the urethra and long-term patient-reported outcomes after radiotherapy with EBRT and HDR brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer.
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decision regret after reirradiation of the primary site in patients with prostate cancer.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Implications of radiation dose exposure to the urethra on urinary morbidity after prostate radiotherapy are poorly understood, especially by long-term patient-reported outcomes (PRO). Therefore, our primary objective was to investigate associations of urethral dose and long-term patient-reported urinary morbidity after external beam radiotherapy and high-dose rate brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer. Materials and methods: We conducted a pre-registered (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/A6DC3) cross-sectional study at a tertiary academic center including a consecutive sample of patients being at least two years after treatment. Primary outcome measurements included urinary domains of the EPIC-26 questionnaire. Their associations with predefined urethral dose levels were assessed by univariable analyses (Pearson's correlation) and by predefined multivariable analyses (multiple regression). Sample size calculation was based on a predefined multivariable model. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Among 277 screened patients, 113 patients were alive, eligible, consented, and provided PRO. The median time passed since radiotherapy was 4 years. Per univariable analysis, a higher near maximum point dose of the urethra (D Conclusions: Very high urethral near point doses appear to be associated with worse long-term patient-reported urinary morbidity after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Urethral dose should be considered in practice and future trials to potentially minimize long-term urinary morbidity. Trial registration: The study protocol was pre-registered prior to patient accrual on the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/A6DC3).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.