ArticleOncology letters2025
Primary lymphoma of the uterine cervix: A systematic review and integrated analysis of case reports and series.
Article in Oncology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lymphoma of the cervix invading the uterine body with distant lymphadenopathy: MRI and FDG-PET/CT findings.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Primary Lymphomas of the Female Genital Tract: Recognizing the Rare Mimicker of Gynecologic Malignancy.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence on the diagnosis and management of women with primary lymphoma of the uterine cervix (PLUC) is limited. The present study performed a systematic review of the literature and provided an overview of the reported cases of PLUC. A total of 213 reports were included, which comprised 339 patients with PLUC. The mean age of the patients was 48.5 years (median, 46 years; age range, 15-88 years). The most common presenting symptom was vaginal bleeding (189/318, 59.4%) and its duration ranged from 4.5 days to 24 months, with only a small fraction of patients developing 'B' symptoms including weight loss, night sweats and fever (28/318, 8.8%). Biopsy (either excisional or punch biopsy) was the most commonly used initial/primary diagnostic modality (78/278, 28.1%) followed by ultrasound (59/278, 21.2%). The most common management approach out of 309 patients was surgery (with or without adjuvant or neo-adjuvant treatment; 115/309), followed by chemotherapy alone (109/309), which was followed by chemo-radiotherapy alone (62/309). The follow-up period for survivors ranged from 4 weeks to 246 months, and the absolute 5-year and 10-year survival rates were 86.1 and 85.4%, respectively. The relatively low number of patients and high heterogeneity did not permit a robust comparative analysis of the survival outcomes. However, the longest median survival was reported for women who received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (15 patients; 72 months). Although malignant PLUC is rare, early detection, optimal therapeutic management, and multidisciplinary involvement of gynecologic oncologists and lymphoma specialists may offer benefit to patients diagnosed with this rare disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.