Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39898287›Full record

ReviewOncology letters2025

Current landscape and future directions of therapeutic approaches for adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary glands (Review).

Katarzyna Stawarz, Monika Durzynska, Adam Gałązka, Anna Gorzelnik, Jakub Zwolinski, Monika Paszkowska, Karolina Bieńkowska-Pluta, Magdalena Misiak-Galazka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katarzyna StawarzDepartment of Head and Neck Cancer, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
Monika DurzynskaDepartment of Pathology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
Adam GałązkaDepartment of Head and Neck Cancer, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
Anna GorzelnikDepartment of Head and Neck Cancer, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
Jakub ZwolinskiDepartment of Head and Neck Cancer, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
Monika PaszkowskaDepartment of Head and Neck Cancer, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
Karolina Bieńkowska-PlutaDepartment of Head and Neck Cancer, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
Magdalena Misiak-GalazkaDepartment of Pathology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the salivary glands is the second most common type of salivary gland cancer, and is characterized by a poor prognosis and an unclear pathology. The incidence of ACC is rare, as it accounts for 10-15% of all salivary gland tumors and affects mainly patients aged between 50 and 60 years. The annual incidence rate is estimated to be ~4.5 cases per 100,000 individuals. Due to its rarity and the use of contaminated cell lines in previous investigations, the precise etiological factors underlying ACC remain poorly understood. Current treatment modalities, typically involving surgery with or without postoperative radiotherapy, often prove unsatisfactory due to the potential for local recurrence and delayed distant metastases, which may manifest 3-5 years after treatment and constitute the primary failure of existing therapeutic approaches. The indolent growth pattern, along with perineural and perivascular invasion, is potentially responsible for the delayed onset of metastases. No effective systemic therapy has been established so far. Therefore, the management of ACC represents a significant therapeutic challenge. Exploring the molecular characteristics of ACC, including the reasons behind its propensity for perineural invasion and its potential correlation with the immune system, offers promising strategies for managing ACC and could open up novel pathways for future therapeutic interventions. Currently, the use of immunotherapy in ACC treatment has shown limited effectiveness. While the exact mechanism underlying the lack of response to immunotherapy in ACC remains unknown, the low levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in these tumors may contribute to this resistance. Therefore, identifying novel targets to enhance the immune response against tumor cells is essential. The present review provides an update on clinical studies and explores novel therapeutic targets that could be effective in the therapeutic management of ACC.

Indexed as

ACCdistant metastaseslocal recurrencePNIradiotherapysurgery

Identifiers

PMID39898287
PMCPMC11782928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.