Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39898278›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024

Cancer theragnostics: closing the loop for advanced personalized cancer treatment through the platform integration of therapeutics and diagnostics.

Olga V Sergeeva, Liang Luo, Anthony Guiseppi-Elie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Olga V SergeevaGenterra JSC, Moscow, Russia.
Liang LuoNational Engineering Research Center for Nanomedicine, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Anthony Guiseppi-ElieBioelectronics, Biosensors and Biochips (C3B®), Department of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer continues to be one of the leading causes of death worldwide, and conventional cancer therapies such as chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery have limitations. RNA therapy and cancer vaccines hold considerable promise as an alternative to conventional therapies for their ability to enable personalized therapy with improved efficacy and reduced side effects. The principal approach of cancer vaccines is to induce a specific immune response against cancer cells. However, a major challenge in cancer immunotherapy is to predict which patients will respond to treatment and to monitor the efficacy of the vaccine during treatment. Theragnostics, an integration of diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities into a single hybrid platform system, has the potential to address these challenges by enabling real-time monitoring of treatment response while allowing endogenously controlled personalized treatment adjustments. In this article, we review the current state-of-the-art in theragnostics for cancer vaccines and RNA therapy, including imaging agents, biomarkers, and other diagnostic tools relevant to cancer, and their application in cancer therapy development and personalization. We also discuss the opportunities and challenges for further development and clinical translation of theragnostics in cancer vaccines.

Indexed as

biomarkerscancer vaccinefeedback controlimmunotherapypersonalized medicineRNA therapytheragnostics

Identifiers

PMID39898278
PMCPMC11782185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.