ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024
Droplet distribution and mitigation of occupational exposure risk in eucalyptus sprout eradication using a remotely piloted aircraft.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of remotely piloted aircrafts (RPAs) for foliar application of pesticides and fertilizers has increased worldwide in several agricultural crops. However, there is little information on the efficiency and factors connected to application and spraying quality of RPAs in forestry, mainly for eradication of eucalyptus sprouts. The objective of this work was to evaluate droplet distribution and deposition on eucalyptus sprouts and the risk of exposure for applicators using an RPA (DJI AGRAS T40) at different theoretical application ranges (7.0, 9.0, and 11.0 m) and droplet sizes (150, 300, and 450µm) compared to a manual electric backpack sprayer (MEBS). The spray solution was composed of water, brilliant blue dye, and adjuvant. Water-sensitive paper cards and flexible polyvinyl chloride cards were positioned on different eucalyptus sprout canopy layers (ESCL) (upper, middle, and lower) to evaluate droplet distribution and deposition. Disposable coveralls, gloves, and respirators were used to evaluate the risk of occupational exposure. The results showed that the application ranges of 7.0 and 9.0 m with droplet sizes of 150µm and 300µm resulted in better droplet distribution throughout the ESCLs. However, the 450µm droplet size resulted in concentration of droplets in the upper ESCL. Using an MEBS resulted in greater heterogeneity in droplet distribution and approximately a 160-fold higher accumulation of droplets on different applicator's body parts compared to the RPA. The results confirmed the efficiency and operational safety of using RPAs for the application of agricultural pesticides and foliar fertilizers in eucalyptus plantations, as well as providing valuable contributions for future research on these practices in eucalyptus cultivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.