ArticleJSES international2025
Muscle strength measurements reflecting the extent of complete subscapularis tears: reliability in patients with rotator cuff tears.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A novel magnetic resonance imaging-based classification of subscapularis muscle atrophy: reproducibility and clinical relevance.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While several clinical tests for diagnosing subscapularis (SSC) tears have been reported, no quantitative method reflecting tear size has been established. This study investigated muscle strength measurements that best reflect the extent of SSC tears and clarified their reliability. Methods: We analyzed 107 patients (111 shoulders) who underwent arthroscopic surgery for rotator cuff tears, assessing preoperative and postoperative muscle strength. Isometric internal rotation strength was measured by using a handheld dynamometer using three techniques: the belly-press, Napoleon, and bear-hug techniques. The correlation between the extent of complete SSC tears and preoperative strength for each technique was assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Intrarater reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (1, 3), minimal detectable change (MDC), and MDC% based on three preoperative measurements on the operated side. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using these parameters from measurements on the nonoperated side preoperatively and at 6- and 12-month postoperative intervals. Results: The correlation coefficient between the extent of SSC tears and the strength of each muscle was approximately -0.45 for all techniques, indicating a weak negative correlation. The intrarater reliability for all techniques showed ICC (1, 3) >0.95, MDC <10 N, and MDC% of approximately 10%. The Napoleon technique demonstrated the highest test-retest reliability, with ICC (3, 1) of 0.87, MDC of 17 N, and MDC% of 21%. Conclusion: The Napoleon technique provided more stable muscle exertion than the other methods. The results may aid in determining whether postoperative muscle strength recovery falls within the range of measurement error.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.