ArticleJSES international2025
Clinical and radiographic outcomes using standard length of cannulated screws for traditional Latarjet procedure.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of open traditional Latarjet stabilization using 32-mm-long and 30-mm-long cannulated screws in males and females, respectively, with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed open Latarjet procedures using cannulated screws of standard length with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Functional evaluation was performed with postoperative Rowe and Walch score, visual analog scale for pain and return to sport. Graft healing was assessed with computed tomography scans at 4 to 6 months postoperatively. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to postoperative radiographic measurements: a bicortical or unicortical screw group. The α angle between the shaft of the screw and the glenoid subchondral bone was measured for superior and inferior screws. Level of significance was 0.05. The post hoc power analysis was 0.89. Results: A total of 69 patients met the criteria for inclusion. Of these patients, 60 (87%) were available for final follow-up (n = 62 shoulders), with a mean age of 28.4 ± 9.5 years (range, 16-55 years) at the time of surgery. Fifty six males (93.3%) and 4 females (6.7%) were included. The mean final follow-up period was a mean of 38 months after the procedure (range, 25-48 months). Eight of 60 patients (13.3%) had persistent apprehension in abduction-external rotation position. One patient (1.7%) had a recurrence of shoulder subluxation. The mean Walch-Duplay score was 90 ± 11.6 points (range, 40-100 points), and the mean Rowe score was 93.4 ± 11 points (range, 50-100 points). The mean visual analog scale score for the evaluation of pain was 0.9 ± 1.3 (range, 0-4). The coracoid healed the glenoid neck in 87.1% (54/62) of the shoulders on the postoperative computed tomography scan. Lower alpha angle for inferior and superior screws had more rate of unicortical fixation ( Conclusion: Open traditional Latarjet procedure using 32-mm-long and 30-mm-long cannulated screws in males and females, respectively, provided good outcomes with acceptable complication rates. Unicortical screws fixation does not have a higher rate of nonunion than bicortical screws.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.