ArticleJSES international2025
Biomechanical enhancement in rotator cuff repairs: the impact of innovative nanofiber technology.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rotator Cuff Repair with Autologous Fascia Lata Augmentation in Patients at High Risk for Repair Failure: Five-Year Follow-Up Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Histologic outcomes of rotator cuff patch augmentation: a literature review.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Review
- Augmentation Techniques for Rotator Cuff Repairs.JBJS reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rotator cuff repair surgeries often face high failure rates, particularly in cases involving tendon degeneration. Traditional repair techniques and devices frequently fail to adequately restore a healthy native enthesis and strong tendon-bone integration. This study investigates the efficacy of a novel, fully synthetic, bioresorbable nanofiber scaffold in restoring the native enthesis and enhancing the biomechanical properties and overall success of rotator cuff repairs, particularly in the context of chronically degenerated tendons. Methods: This study used an ovine model to simulate chronic tendon degeneration with subsequent rotator cuff transection and repair. All repairs were performed using the standard double-row configuration with suture tape; half of the repairs were augmented with the bioresorbable nanofiber scaffold. Nondestructive biomechanical testing was conducted to assess the strength of the repair constructs, followed by histological analysis of all tendon samples to evaluate tissue regeneration and integration at the repair site. Results: Results demonstrated that the scaffold group achieved significantly improved biomechanical properties (peak force, peak stress, equilibrium force, and equilibrium stress) compared to the suture only group, indicating enhanced repair strength and native enthesis restoration. Scaffold samples exhibited significantly decreased cross-sectional areas (ie, less fibrosis) which were similar to healthy tendons. Histological findings indicated the scaffold did not impede re-establishment of Sharpey-like fibers at the tendon insertion. Conclusion: This study provides compelling evidence that the use of a fully synthetic, bioresorbable nanofiber scaffold in rotator cuff repair significantly improves biomechanical outcomes and enthesis regeneration. These improvements were achieved while retaining close to native tendon thickness. The findings suggest that this scaffold represents a significant advancement in rotator cuff repair technology, offering a promising solution to enhance repair strength and quality of bone-tendon integration, especially in challenging cases of tendon degeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.