ArticleJSES international2025
Short humeral stem in total shoulder arthroplasty does not jeopardize primary implant stability.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and risk factors for stem subsidence following reverse shoulder arthroplasty using on-lay press-fit short stems.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Volumetric Humeral Canal Fill Ratio Effects Primary Stability and Cortical Bone Loading in Short and Standard Stem Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Biomechanical and Computational Study.Journal of imaging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The trend of the modern humeral components in total shoulder arthroplasty is toward shorter and shorter humeral stems. However, the question remains whether short uncemented stems can provide the same implant stability as long stems. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the torsional primary stability and the pull-out extraction force of both a long and a short version of the same stem. Materials and methods: Ten humeral components (five long stems and five short stems) were press-fitted into ten synthetic composite humeri. A torsional load was applied to generate the most critical loading condition. The specimens were loaded with 100 cycles between 2 Nm and 10 Nm, at 1 Hz. A 3D Digital Image Correlation system was used to measure the relative displacement between the prosthesis and the host bone during the test. After completing the torsional test, the pull-out force was measured. Differences between the long and short stem on the biomechanical parameters (permanent migrations, inducible micromotion, and extraction force) were tested with the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test ( Results: The main rotational inducible micromotion was around the craniocaudal axis. No significant differences were found between the rotational permanent migrations of the long and short stem around the craniocaudal ( Discussion and Conclusion: No statistically significant difference was found between the long-stem and short-stem implants. These results show that short uncemented stems can provide adequate primary mechanical stability. As the long-stem version of this stem is already clinically used, the present findings suggest that the short version can be reasonably expected to deliver similar outcomes in terms of implant stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.