ArticleThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne2025
Iatrogenic cecal perforation after abdominal drain placement on a horse.
Article in The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Iatrogenic cecal perforation after abdominal drain placement on a horse.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 16-year-old, French saddlebred horse was referred for examination because of colic signs, diagnosed with incarceration of the jejunum in a mesoduodenic rent, and subsequently treated surgically (with an end-to-end anastomosis of the jejunum and an enterotomy of the pelvic flexure). The horse initially recovered without complications; however, on the following day, it exhibited moderate signs of endotoxemia and severe serosanguineous discharge from the abdominal wound. Abdominal ultrasonography revealed substantial peritoneal effusion, necessitating the placement of an abdominal drain. The blind drain insertion resulted in the drainage of a brown, malodorous liquid, identified as enteral fluid. Subsequently, the drain inadvertently penetrated the viscera, prompting immediate surgery. An embolectomy catheter was placed in the drain before induction, and the Fogarty catheter cuff was inflated as the horse was induced. The drain was carefully removed from the viscera, maintaining traction on the embolectomy catheter until a repeat laparotomy was done. Moderate contamination of the abdominal cavity occurred during the iatrogenic perforation of the cecum. The balloon catheter effectively sealed the breach in the cecum, demonstrating sufficient strength to pull on the viscera without causing tears. The abdominal cavity was lavaged with 80 L of Ringer's lactate, and another abdominal drain was placed. The horse recovered without further complications throughout the remainder of its hospitalization and returned to its intended use within 6 mo. Key clinical message: Abdominal drain placement carries the risk of complications, including enteric misplacement. Temporary occlusion of the defect is achievable using an embolectomy catheter pending surgery. Swift action in response to complications can help limit contamination of the abdominal cavity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39898165PMC11770612What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.