ReviewCureus2024
Ethnic Differences in Ascending Aorta Dimensions and Dilatation Rates: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management Challenges and Clinical Characteristics of Refractory Status Epilepticus in Mexico: A 102 Patient Retrospective Cohort Study.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Applicability of Guideline-Based Aortic Intervention Thresholds in the Indian Population.The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon · 2026Article
- Dissection dimensions differ: Global variability in ascending aortic size challenges universal surgical thresholds.JTCVS structural and endovascular · 2026Article
- Diversity and Representation in Cardiovascular Research: Evidence Gaps, Emerging Models, and Policy Implications.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Review
- Ethnic variation in thoracic aortic dimensions in the general population: a comparison between Indian and Dutch populations.Open heart · 2026Article
- Superior aortic strain and ventriculoarterial coupling in older women are moderately correlated with Framingham 10-year risk.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ethnic differences may substantially influence the morphological characteristics of the ascending aorta, with potential implications for clinical assessment and management of aortic dilatation. This systematic review evaluated the impact of ethnicity on ascending aorta diameter and dilatation rates, highlighting the need for more tailored, ethnicity-specific care in cardiovascular practice. We identified 11 studies that measured ascending aorta dimensions using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Most investigations focused on Asian, Caucasian, African American, and Hispanic populations. Data extraction revealed notable variability in baseline aortic diameters across ethnic groups. Some studies found no significant differences between Asian and Caucasian participants, whereas others reported consistently larger diameters in Chinese ethnicities compared to Caucasians and smaller diameters in African American groups. One investigation, for instance, showed that Chinese participants had ascending aorta diameters approximately 1.5 mm larger than their Caucasian counterparts. Dilatation rates also diverged: one study observed that non-White race was linked to earlier or more rapid aortic root dilation in younger populations. At the same time, another reported that Vietnamese individuals had nearly twice the annual growth rate of ascending aorta dilatation when compared to other ethnicities. Available data on prevalence varied, with some studies suggesting ascending aorta dilatation ranged from about 1.2% to 7.5% in Caucasians, 0.9% to 6.4% in African Americans, and 0.8% to 5.9% in Asians. These findings potentiate the role of ethnicity in shaping aortic dimensions, possibly through a combination of genetic predisposition, environmental factors, and lifestyle influences. Incorporating ethnic background into risk stratification may improve the accuracy of clinical assessments and help guide personalized management strategies for ascending aorta dilatation. Future research should address heterogeneity in measurement techniques, more consistently defining ethnic groups, and explore long-term outcomes to clarify whether these observed morphological differences translate into variations in morbidity and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.