Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39898134›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Liver Bed Infiltration With Isobaric Levobupivacaine Versus Intravenous Paracetamol Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Shilaga Dhar, Amandeep Kaur, Reecha Panghal, Mubadil Mushtaq, Ivneet Kaur, Aastha Gupta, Pankaj Kumar, Falak Deeba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Advances in nanostructured drug delivery systems for cardiovascular therapeutics.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shilaga DharAnesthesia, Adesh Medical College and Hospital, Kurukshetra, IND.
Amandeep KaurAnesthesia, Adesh Medical College and Hospital, Kurukshetra, IND.
Reecha PanghalAnesthesia, Adesh Medical College and Hospital, Kurukshetra, IND.
Mubadil MushtaqAnesthesia, Ujala Healthcare Services Private Limited, Kashipur, IND.
Ivneet KaurAnesthesia, Adesh Medical College and Hospital, Kurukshetra, IND.
Aastha GuptaAnesthesia, Mahavir Sansthan Cancer Hospital, Patna, IND.
Pankaj KumarAnesthesia, Adesh Medical College and Hospital, Kurukshetra, IND.
Falak DeebaAnesthesia, Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital, Bareilly, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives The study aimed to compare the use of isobaric levobupivacaine for liver bed infiltration and intravenous analgesia with paracetamol (acetaminophen) in managing postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods An observational study was conducted on 80 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Inclusion criteria comprised adults of American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I, aged 18-65, undergoing elective surgeries. Exclusion criteria were contraindications to local anesthetics, history of chronic pain disorders, or ongoing opioid therapy. Participants were divided into two groups: Group LB receiving 30-40 ml 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine for liver bed infiltration, and Group P receiving paracetamol 1 g intravenous during surgery just after removing the gallbladder out of the laparoscopic port. Primary outcomes included pain scores assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) at one hour, six hours, 12 hours, 18 hours, and 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the total analgesic consumption, patient satisfaction scores, and any adverse effects experienced. Results In Group LB, the VAS scores showed a declining trend, starting at 6.4 ± 0.8 at one hour and decreasing to 4.5 ± 1.5 at six hours, 4.1 ± 1.7 at 12 hours, 2.6 ± 1.3 at 18 hours, and 1.3 ± 0.6 at 24 hours. In Group P, the VAS scores also decreased, beginning at 7.2 ± 1.1 at one hour, then dropping to 5.2 ± 1.2 at six hours, 4.8 ± 1.1 at 12 hours, 3.2 ± 0.9 at 18 hours, and 1.8 ± 0.5 at 24 hours. However, statistically, VAS scores were significantly lower in Group LB as compared to Group P at all time points: one hour, six hours, 12 hours, 18 hours, and 24 hours (p<0.05). Group LB demonstrated significantly better outcomes compared to Group P, including a longer time to first rescue analgesia (12 vs. five hours, p<0.0001), a reduced dose of additional analgesic requirement (3 ± 1 vs. 6 ± 2 µg/kg, p<0.0001), and higher patient satisfaction (38 (95%) vs. 23 (57.5%), p=0.0001). The incidence of nausea (3 (7.5%) vs. 6 (15%), P=0.481) and vomiting (5 (12.5%) vs. 8 (20%), p=0.363) was comparable between Group LB and Group P. Conclusion The use of levobupivacaine for liver bed infiltration provided adequate pain relief following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in comparison to paracetamol intravenous analgesia. Side effects like nausea and vomiting were statistically comparable in both groups. Overall, levobupivacaine for liver bed infiltration is a safe and effective option for controlling pain and increasing satisfaction among patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Indexed as

cholecystectomylevobupivacaineoutcomespainsatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID39898134
PMCPMC11781901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.