ArticleCureus2024
Liver Bed Infiltration With Isobaric Levobupivacaine Versus Intravenous Paracetamol Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exercise-induced neuropeptidergic and neurochemical neuroadaptation in stress regulation and emotional disorders.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Review
- Advances in nanostructured drug delivery systems for cardiovascular therapeutics.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2025Review
- Efficacy and safety of hydromorphone for postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for patients undergoing orthopedic surgery: a randomized, double-blinded controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives The study aimed to compare the use of isobaric levobupivacaine for liver bed infiltration and intravenous analgesia with paracetamol (acetaminophen) in managing postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods An observational study was conducted on 80 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Inclusion criteria comprised adults of American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I, aged 18-65, undergoing elective surgeries. Exclusion criteria were contraindications to local anesthetics, history of chronic pain disorders, or ongoing opioid therapy. Participants were divided into two groups: Group LB receiving 30-40 ml 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine for liver bed infiltration, and Group P receiving paracetamol 1 g intravenous during surgery just after removing the gallbladder out of the laparoscopic port. Primary outcomes included pain scores assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) at one hour, six hours, 12 hours, 18 hours, and 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the total analgesic consumption, patient satisfaction scores, and any adverse effects experienced. Results In Group LB, the VAS scores showed a declining trend, starting at 6.4 ± 0.8 at one hour and decreasing to 4.5 ± 1.5 at six hours, 4.1 ± 1.7 at 12 hours, 2.6 ± 1.3 at 18 hours, and 1.3 ± 0.6 at 24 hours. In Group P, the VAS scores also decreased, beginning at 7.2 ± 1.1 at one hour, then dropping to 5.2 ± 1.2 at six hours, 4.8 ± 1.1 at 12 hours, 3.2 ± 0.9 at 18 hours, and 1.8 ± 0.5 at 24 hours. However, statistically, VAS scores were significantly lower in Group LB as compared to Group P at all time points: one hour, six hours, 12 hours, 18 hours, and 24 hours (p<0.05). Group LB demonstrated significantly better outcomes compared to Group P, including a longer time to first rescue analgesia (12 vs. five hours, p<0.0001), a reduced dose of additional analgesic requirement (3 ± 1 vs. 6 ± 2 µg/kg, p<0.0001), and higher patient satisfaction (38 (95%) vs. 23 (57.5%), p=0.0001). The incidence of nausea (3 (7.5%) vs. 6 (15%), P=0.481) and vomiting (5 (12.5%) vs. 8 (20%), p=0.363) was comparable between Group LB and Group P. Conclusion The use of levobupivacaine for liver bed infiltration provided adequate pain relief following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in comparison to paracetamol intravenous analgesia. Side effects like nausea and vomiting were statistically comparable in both groups. Overall, levobupivacaine for liver bed infiltration is a safe and effective option for controlling pain and increasing satisfaction among patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.