Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39898045›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

Augmenting flexibility: mutual inhibition between inhibitory neurons expands functional diversity.

Belle Liu, Alexander James White, Chung-Chuan Lo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Belle LiuInstitute of Systems Neuroscience, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu City 30080, Taiwan.
Alexander James WhiteInstitute of Systems Neuroscience, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu City 30080, Taiwan.
Chung-Chuan LoInstitute of Systems Neuroscience, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu City 30080, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in microcircuit analysis of nervous systems have revealed a plethora of mutual connections between inhibitory interneurons across many different species and brain regions. The abundance of these mutual connections has not been fully explained. Strikingly, we show that neural circuits with mutually inhibitory connections are able to rapidly and flexibly switch between distinct functions. That is, multiple functions coexist for a single set of synaptic weights. Here, we develop a theoretical framework to explain how inhibitory recurrent circuits give rise to this flexibility and show that mutual inhibition doubles the number of cusp bifurcations in small neural circuits. As a concrete example, we study a class of functional motifs we call coupled recurrent inhibitory and recurrent excitatory loops (CRIRELs). These CRIRELs have the advantage of being both multi-functional and controllable, performing a plethora of functions, including decisions, memory, toggle, and so forth. Finally, we demonstrate how mutual inhibition maximizes storage capacity for larger networks.

Indexed as

NeuroscienceTheory of computation

Identifiers

PMID39898045
PMCPMC11787539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.