ArticleBrain & spine2025
Augmented reality (AR) in microsurgical multimodal image guided focal pediatric epilepsy surgery: Results of a retrospective feasibility study.
Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extended Reality in Neurosurgery : Surgical Planning, Navigation, Education, and Patient Communication.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- Anatomical localization and resection of a refractory epileptic focus in the right supplementary motor area/presupplementary motor area using augmented reality: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Real-time augmented reality navigation in brain glioma resection: a pilot feasibility study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Multimodal Imaging in Epilepsy Surgery for Personalized Neurosurgical Planning.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Intraoperative Computed Tomography, Ultrasound, and Augmented Reality in Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Surgery-A Retrospective Cohort Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and research question: Augmented reality (AR) is increasingly being used to improve surgical planning and assist in real time surgical procedures. A retrospective investigation was conducted to study its feasibility in pediatric epilepsy surgery at a single institution. Methods: Functional neuronavigation using multimodal imaging data (fMRI, DTI-tractography, PET, SPECT, sEEG) were used to augment the surgical navigation by transferring MRI imaging reconstructions as AR maps into the surgical microscope overlaying the surgical field. Results: Altogether, 43 patients (17 female, 0-18 yrs, mean 9 yrs) were operated between 10/2020 and 10/2023 and fulfilled the inclusion criteria. 26 patients (60.5%) had an extra-temporal and 17 (39.5%) a temporal seizure origin. The 3 top histological diagnoses encountered were: FCD (32.6%), ganglioglioma (23.3%) and DNET (11.6%). Preoperative MRI studies showed no epileptogenic lesion in 11 patients (25.6%, MRI negativ group), which necessitated implantation of depth electrodes before resection. There were no adverse events while using AR enhanced neuronavigation. Altogether, of 24 patients with a follow up of more than one year, 83.3% displayed a favorable ILAE grade 1 seizure outcome (75% ILAE 1a), 14 % experienced a transient hemiparesis, 4.3% a permanent quadrantanopia and one needed a subdural-peritoneal shunt. Discussion and conclusion: AR supported navigated microscope resection allowed targeting and removal of lesional as well as non-lesional (sEEG defined) epileptogenic zones in pediatric epilepsy surgery with low morbidity and an expected seizure outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.