Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39897956›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024

Comparison of Individualized Rescue Luteal Phase Support Strategies with Vaginal and Combined Vaginal & Subcutaneous Progesterone Administration in Artificial Frozen-Thawed Blastocyst Embryo Transfer Cycles Based on Serum Progesterone levels.

Secil Irem Arik Alpcetin, Onur Ince, Bengisu Akcay, Munire Funda Cevher Akdulum, Erhan Demirdag, Ahmet Erdem, Mehmet Erdem

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Secil Irem Arik AlpcetinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Onur InceDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Bengisu AkcayDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Munire Funda Cevher AkdulumDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Erhan DemirdagDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Ahmet ErdemDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Mehmet ErdemDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles are common in assisted reproductive techniques. As the corpus luteum is absent in these cycles, luteal phase support is provided by administering progesterone (P4) through transvaginal, parenteral, or oral routes. Low serum levels of P4 (below 9-10 ng/mL) on the day before embryo transfer (ET) have been associated with unfavorable cycle outcomes. The aim of this study is to investigate whether individualizing luteal support through rescue protocols in patients with low serum P4 levels improves pregnancy outcomes in HRT-FET cycles. Material and method: This retrospective, single-center cohort analysis includes 1257 cycles involving 942 patients undergoing HRT-FET. Starting in 2019, we have assessed P4 levels before ET day and adjusted MVP doses when P4 levels were <10 ng/mL. In 2021, subcutaneous (SC) P4 was routinely added alongside MVP, with SC doses increased if P4 levels were <10 ng/mL. In this study, Groups 1 and 2 received MVP for luteal support, while Groups 3 and 4 received additional SC progesterone. For patients with P levels below the cut-off level (10 ng/mL) in Groups 2 and 4, the P dose was doubled through a rescue protocol. Results: In the MVP and MVP plus SC groups, 15.8% and 8.9% of the cycles had P4 levels <10 ng/mL, respectively. Ongoing pregnancy rates (OPR) and clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) did not differ between study groups. Regression analysis with a mixed model revealed that age, endometrial thickness, and estradiol levels were confounding factors as well as independent predictors of ongoing pregnancy rates (p<0.05). Pairwise regression analysis revealed no significant differences in pregnancy rates between the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Individualizing luteal phase support based on serum P4 levels on the day of ET in FET cycles with HRT may enhance pregnancy outcomes by either doubling the vaginal dose or increasing the SC dose during MVP plus SC administration. The implemented rescue protocol allowed patients with low progesterone levels to achieve pregnancy outcomes similar to those with higher progesterone levels.

Indexed as

Embryo TransferLuteal PhaseProgesteroneAdministration, IntravaginalAdultCryopreservationFemaleFertilization in VitroHormone Replacement TherapyHumansInjections, SubcutaneousPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesProgesteroneassisted reproductive techniquesfrozen embryo replacement cycleinfertilityluteal phase support (LPS)progesterone

Identifiers

PMID39897956
PMCPMC11782913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.