Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39897953›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024

Spinal neuromodulation using ultra low frequency waveform inhibits sensory signaling to the thalamus and preferentially reduces aberrant firing of thalamic neurons in a model of neuropathic pain.

Martyn G Jones, Liam A Matthews, Scott Lempka, Nishant Verma, James P Harris, Stephen B McMahon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Martyn G JonesWolfson Sensory, Pain and Regeneration Centre, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Liam A MatthewsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Scott LempkaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Nishant VermaPresidio Medical Inc., San Mateo, CA, United States.
James P HarrisPresidio Medical Inc., San Mateo, CA, United States.
Stephen B McMahonWolfson Sensory, Pain and Regeneration Centre, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Many forms of chronic pain remain refractory to existing pharmacotherapies and electrical neuromodulation. We have recently reported the clinical efficacy of a novel form of analgesic electrical neuromodulation that uses ultra low frequency (ULF Methods: In naïve, neuropathic and sham-operated rats, recordings of ongoing and evoked activity were made from thalamic neurons, targeting the ventral posterolateral (VPL) nucleus. Results: Responses to electrical stimulation of hind limb receptive fields were reduced in 25 of 32 (78%) neurons tested with lumbar epidural ULF neuromodulation. Cells preferentially responsive to low intensity stimulation were more likely to be found than cells responding to a range of stimulus intensities, or high intensity only; and low threshold responses were more likely to be inhibited by ULF than high threshold responses. On-going activity unrelated to hindlimb stimulation, observed in 17 of 39 neurons in naïve animals (44%), was reduced by lumbar epidural ULF current in only 3 of 14 (21%) neurons tested with ULF. By contrast, in rats with a well-characterized neuropathic injury, spinal nerve ligation (SNL), we found a much higher incidence of on-going activity in thalamic neurons: 53 of 55 neurons (96%) displayed firing unrelated to hindlimb stimulation. In this group, ULF current reduced thalamic neurone discharge rate in 19 of 29 (66%) neurons tested. In sham-operated animals, the incidence of such activity in thalamic neurons and the effect of ULF current were not significantly different from the naïve group. Discussion: We conclude firstly that ULF current can acutely and reversibly interrupt signaling between sensory afferent fibers and relay neurons of the thalamus. Second, ongoing activity of thalamic neurons increases dramatically in the early stages following neuropathic injury. Third, this novel form of neuromodulation preferentially attenuates pathological thalamic activity in this neuropathic model compared to normal activity in naïve and sham-operated animals. This study, therefore, demonstrates that epidural ULF current can reduce nerve injury-related abnormal activity reaching the brain. These findings help advance understanding of possible mechanisms for the analgesic effects of ULF neuromodulation.

Indexed as

inhibitionneuropathicpainspinal cord stimulationthalamusULF™ neuromodulation

Identifiers

PMID39897953
PMCPMC11783389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.