ArticleHeliyon2025
Horizontal rectus muscle insertion sites in patients with infantile esotropia and acute acquired concomitant esotropia.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anterior horizontal rectus anatomy in children with concomitant strabismus.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the characteristics of horizontal rectus muscle insertion sites in patients with infantile esotropia (IE) and acute acquired concomitant esotropia (AACE). Methods: The medical records of 166 IE patients and 261 AACE patients who underwent horizontal rectus muscle surgeries were reviewed retrospectively, including age at surgery, spherical equivalent (SE), and angle of esodeviation at near and distance. The limbus-insertion distances (LID) and widths of the medial rectus (MR) and lateral rectus (LR) muscles were measured intraoperatively using a caliper. The insertion parameters and clinical features were compared between different ages and types of esotropia, and a correlation analysis was performed between these variables. Results: In IE patients under 12 years old, the MR LID was positively correlated with age, whereas the LR LID was negatively correlated with the angle of esodeviation at distance. In IE patients over 12 years old, the LR width was negatively correlated with the angle of esodeviation at near. In AACE patients, the MR LID was negatively correlated with the angle of esodeviation at distance, whereas the LR width was negatively correlated with the SE. Conclusions: The LID and width of the horizontal rectus muscle insertions were not significantly different in age-matched patients with IE and AACE. In IE patients, the LR insertion parameters were correlated with the angle of esodeviation, but in AACE patients, the MR LID was correlated with the angle of esodeviation. The clinical significance of these findings still needs to be investigated further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.