Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39897898›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

The evaluation of shear bond strength of denture teeth to CAD/CAM dentures acrylic after aging in gastric acid.

Neslihan Güntekin, Burcu Kızılırmak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Neslihan GüntekinDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Burcu KızılırmakDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro study is to compare the shear bond strengths of denture base resins obtained by different methods with different artificial teeth and to investigate their resistance to bonding by gastric acid in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Samples were prepared using two different manufacturing methods for denture base resins (heat-polymerization and CAD/CAM) and three different types of artificial teeth (acrylic, Microfiller Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite and CAD/CAM milled). CAD/CAM-milled denture base was combined with three different artificial teeth, while heat-polymerized base was combined with acrylic teeth. Each base-tooth combination was randomly divided into 2 subgroups (n = 14). One subgroup was immersed in artificial gastric acid and the other in artificial saliva solution. Shear bond strength testing was performed using a universal testing machine. The results obtained were analysed using two-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons were examined using Tukey's test. A significance level of p < 0.050 was used. The heat-polymerized acrylic base and acrylic teeth groups showed the highest shear bond strength (p < 0.001). There is no significant difference between the shear bond strengths of artificial gastric acid and artificial saliva groups (p = 0.152). CAD/CAM milled denture base resin bonded to different types of prefabricated teeth show similar shear bond strength. The bond strength of acrylic teeth bonded to a heat-polymerized acrylic base is higher. Gastric acid does not affect the shear bond strength.

Indexed as

CAD/CAMDenture baseGastric acidShear bond strength

Identifiers

PMID39897898
PMCPMC11786675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.