Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39897897›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

A new strategy for constructing alternative consumer confidence indexes to explain household consumption: A fuzzy DEMATEL approach.

Özge Var, Alptekin Durmuşoğlu, Türkay Dereli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Özge VarDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Alptekin DurmuşoğluDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Samsun University, Samsun, Turkey.
Türkay DereliOffice of President, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Consumer Confidence Index (CCI) is a measure obtained from consumer surveys (CS) that gauges assessments and expectations of the economic environment. Common practice uses 4 of the 12 questions in CCI calculation. However, efforts to find best set of questions continue, such as the European Commission swapping two questions in 2019. Literature studies employ different combinations of questions; however all-alternative combinations take too much time and computational power. The questions also exhibit cause-and-effect relationships as household consumption predictors and are not statistically independent of one another. Objective: We suggest classifying the CS questions as "Causes" and "Effects." It makes sense that inquiries in the cause group should provide a better explanation of household consumption. If this theory turns out to be correct, a smaller solution space will be able to be used to find the ideal substitute CCI. Method: A fuzzy DEMATEL (Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory), a reliable method to present causal relationships, is used to classification. The prediction power of cause group (in terms of explaining household expenditures) is measured with the Lasso regression (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator), which provides more interpretable regression models. This approach was applied to European Union dataset from 2007Q3 to 2021Q2. Results: The cause group included four CS questions and explained the 75% variability of the consumption expenditures. It is performed comparably to earlier studies that took into account all possible question combinations. The Türkiye case, covering data from 2007 to 2021, supported the finding of EU case, explaining 84% variation in consumption expenditures. Conclusion: These encouraging results suggest that comparable prediction power can be attained with a significant reduction in effort (in comparison to all brute force). Therefore, this approach would provide shortcut for constructing alternative CCIs to the authorities.

Indexed as

Consumer confidence indexConsumer surveysFuzzy DEMATELHousehold consumptionLasso regression

Identifiers

PMID39897897
PMCPMC11782982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.