ArticleHeliyon2025
Analysis of oral cancer carcinogens in repeatedly heated cooking oils.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MnORSC advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The consumption of fried food has assimilated itself as a part of food culture globally. Therefore, it is important to know the toxigenicity of cooking oils used when exposed to high temperatures. The incidence of oral cancer in recent years has been on the rise; ninety percent of the cancers present in the oral cavity are squamous cell carcinoma with multiple major contributing lifestyle factors such well as the presence of the human papilloma virus. Not all mechanisms of carcinogenesis are fully understood and are complex. Furthermore, most cooking oil manufacturers do not provide recommended cooking temperatures on their product labels. Instead, they typically advise storing oils away from direct sunlight and at room temperature, leaving consumers unaware of the safe usage lim-its during cooking. Objective: This study was conducted to analyze repeated cooking oils available in Suva, Fiji for harmful levels of genotoxic carcinogens. Results: The concentrations of Benzo[a]pyrene and Glycidol detected in the cooking oils tested were not significant, as they remained below 2 μg/kg. However, two measurable peaks in 3-monochloropropanediol (3-MCPD) were detected in olive oil (115.6 ng/ml) and Soya bean oil (117.2 ng/ml). Conclusion: Elevated 3-MCPD levels were found in Soya bean and olive reheated cooking oils exceeding tolerable daily intake levels and indicating potential health risks. Future research should evaluate the carcinogenic potential of cooking oils in real-world settings, such as fast-food establishments. This could inform public health policies on safer oil usage practices and raise consumer awareness about the risks of consuming foods cooked with overheated or reused oils.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.